27.06.2015 Views

3071-The political economy of new slavery

3071-The political economy of new slavery

3071-The political economy of new slavery

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

244 Slavery as Piracy<br />

quantum. A sum too small would be an insult and a sum too large<br />

would be unpayable.<br />

Reparations for the slave trade provide an opportunity for a flexible,<br />

dynamic approach. <strong>The</strong>re is likely to be very little reliance on individual<br />

claims. Indeed the nature <strong>of</strong> the reparations claim for the slave trade is<br />

the opposite <strong>of</strong> the individual claim. It is to restore dignity to groups<br />

and to acknowledge a mass wrongdoing and illegality.<br />

<strong>The</strong> awards could be divided into three. First, those directed towards<br />

states as debt relief payments, paid directly to the state; second, those<br />

achieved through the lifting <strong>of</strong> specific trade barriers; and third, payments<br />

aimed at civil society groups focusing on social entitlements such<br />

as education and health. Reparations also address the barriers to enjoyment<br />

<strong>of</strong> human rights, promoting the survival and participation <strong>of</strong><br />

groups who were once at risk <strong>of</strong> perishing. In this sense reparations are<br />

transformative.<br />

<strong>The</strong> discussions surrounding both debt relief and the lifting <strong>of</strong> trade<br />

barriers would take on a completely different hue. Reparations for the<br />

slave trade also provide an opportunity to create a tool to address<br />

ongoing issues <strong>of</strong> inequality between developing and industrialized<br />

states. This does raise the question <strong>of</strong> whether the compensation culture<br />

is being used to replace a more equitable international order but it is not<br />

a question <strong>of</strong> either/or. In the past the linking <strong>of</strong> debt relief to poverty<br />

reduction and the lifting <strong>of</strong> trade barriers have <strong>of</strong>ten erroneously been<br />

perceived as goodwill in response to special pleading by African<br />

states. Arguably some <strong>of</strong> the debts owe their origin to remedying an<br />

impoverishment to which the slave trade may have contributed. Such<br />

an approach is supported by international human rights law. In a case<br />

against Surinam under the Inter-American Convention on Human<br />

Rights, the Aloeboetoe case, which is particularly apposite because <strong>of</strong><br />

the difficulty in identifying the victim’s descendants, the Court ordered<br />

the creation <strong>of</strong> trust funds and the reopening and staffing <strong>of</strong> a school. 19<br />

Hence compensation does not have to be considered within a narrow<br />

context. <strong>The</strong> carefully targeted cancellation <strong>of</strong> debt and the lifting <strong>of</strong><br />

punitive trade barriers are therefore not issues only <strong>of</strong> relief but become<br />

facets <strong>of</strong> compensation and therefore <strong>of</strong> justice.<br />

<strong>The</strong> need for an international charter for reparations for the<br />

slave trade<br />

Individual states could make reparations on an individual basis for the<br />

slave trade following the examples <strong>of</strong> the United States with regard to

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!