10.07.2015 Views

Download (4Mb) - Etheses - Saurashtra University

Download (4Mb) - Etheses - Saurashtra University

Download (4Mb) - Etheses - Saurashtra University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3.6 Biological Evaluation of PPI’s3.6.1 Acute toxicity study (LD 50 determination)Part-IResults and DiscussionThe acute oral toxicity study of newly synthesized derivatives was carried out as per theguidelines set by Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)guideline 423. OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals are periodically reviewedin the light of scientific progress or changing assessment practices. The original Guideline423 was adopted in March 1996 as the second alternative to the conventional acutetoxicity test, described in Test Guideline 401.Principle of the test:The principle of the test based on a stepwise procedure with the use of a minimumnumber of animals per step; sufficient information is obtained on the acute toxicity of thetest substance to enable its classification. The substance is administered orally to a groupof experimental animals at one of the defined doses. The substance is tested using astepwise procedure, each step using three animals of a single sex (normally females).Absence or presence of compound-related mortality of the animals dosed at one step willdetermine the next step, i.e.- no further testing is needed,- dosing of three additional animals, with the same dose- dosing of three additional animals at the next higher or the next lower dose level.Description of the method:The acute toxic class method/OECD423 45 set out in this guideline is a stepwise procedurewith the use of three animals of a single sex per step. Depending on the mortality and/orthe moribund status of the animals, on average 2-4 steps may be necessary to allowjudgment on the acute toxicity of the test substance. The acute toxic class method is basedon biometric evaluations 46 with fixed doses, adequately separated to enable a substance tobe ranked for classification purposes and hazard assessment. The method as adopted in1996 was extensively validated in vivo against LD 50 data obtained from the literature,both nationally and internationally.The preferred rodent species is the rat, although other rodent species may be used.Normally females are used (OECD, 2000). Females were nulliparous and non-pregnant.The animals were randomly selected, marked to permit individual identification, and kept115

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!