A global review of disaster reduction initiatives - Welcome to the ...
A global review of disaster reduction initiatives - Welcome to the ...
A global review of disaster reduction initiatives - Welcome to the ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
3Living with Risk: A <strong>global</strong> <strong>review</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>disaster</strong> <strong>reduction</strong> <strong>initiatives</strong>strategies contribute <strong>to</strong> mainstreaming community-based<strong>disaster</strong> management in poorand vulnerable communities as a cost effectiveoption.Community leadership and relationshipsAny system <strong>of</strong> local planning and protectionmust be integrated in<strong>to</strong> larger administrativeand resource capabilities such as provincial,state and national <strong>disaster</strong> plans and risk<strong>reduction</strong> strategies. It is equally important <strong>to</strong>realize that communities cannot implementcommunity-based <strong>disaster</strong> mitigation alone.Viable forms <strong>of</strong> community-based <strong>disaster</strong><strong>reduction</strong> depend on a favourable politicalenvironment that understands, promotes andsupports this participation process.A recent Australian study found that <strong>the</strong> extent<strong>of</strong> commitment by local governments <strong>to</strong> takeaction depends on emergency managers making<strong>the</strong> right choices about citizen involvementin planning risk <strong>reduction</strong> processes. This canbuild an informed constituency for <strong>disaster</strong><strong>reduction</strong> and drive a real commitment amongelected <strong>of</strong>ficials <strong>to</strong> take action. Key decisionsinclude:• Objectives <strong>to</strong> be achieved by involvingcitizens.• Areas in <strong>the</strong> planning process where, andwhen, citizens participate.• Which citizens <strong>to</strong> include.• Techniques <strong>to</strong> use in order <strong>to</strong> obtain citizeninput.• Information that is <strong>to</strong> be provided <strong>to</strong> citizens.Disasters are opportunities for change andcommunity development. Women are participatingactively in rehabilitation and reconstructionaround <strong>the</strong> world. Their organizationshave a special role <strong>to</strong> play, and are doingso in several places. “Networks <strong>of</strong> networks” isan increasing phenomena among communitybasedorganizations and NGOs <strong>to</strong> share <strong>the</strong>irown experiences among community leadersand groups. One such network linkingwomen’s organizations is <strong>the</strong> Grass Root OrganizationOperating in Sisterhood (GROOTS).The following are examples from Gujarat,India, and Turkey, <strong>of</strong> shared experiences withinthis network.People - especially women - rebuilding <strong>the</strong>ir own communities in GujaratImmediately after <strong>the</strong> Gujarat, India, earthquake in January 2001, Swayam Shiksam Prayong (SSP), (self-educationfor empowerment), an Indian NGO, joined many community-based organizations in <strong>the</strong> recovery effort. Drawingon <strong>the</strong>ir prior experience following <strong>the</strong> Latur earthquake in <strong>the</strong> Maharashtra State <strong>of</strong> India in 1993, <strong>the</strong>y proposeda policy, which would not only rebuild <strong>the</strong> devastated Gujarat communities but reform and streng<strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong>ir socialand political structures. The central concept was that people – especially women – need <strong>to</strong> rebuild <strong>the</strong>ir own communities.Key elements <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> strategy included:• Using reconstruction as an opportunity <strong>to</strong> build local capacities and skills.• Forming village development committees made up <strong>of</strong> women’s groups and o<strong>the</strong>r community institutions <strong>to</strong>manage rehabilitation.• Engaging village committees <strong>to</strong> moni<strong>to</strong>r earthquake-safe construction.• Redressing grievances at <strong>the</strong> village level.• Striving <strong>to</strong> locate financial and technical assistance within easy reach <strong>of</strong> affected communities, and not bedependent on its being mediated by o<strong>the</strong>rs.• Arriving at a clear definition <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> role <strong>of</strong> local governments in planning and moni<strong>to</strong>ring, information flow,problem-solving, and infrastructure use and development.• Distributing information about earthquake safety and entitlement <strong>to</strong> all homeowners.• Encouraging <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> local skills and labour, and retraining local artisans in earthquake-resistant technology.• Including women in all aspects <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> reconstruction.• Assigning titles <strong>of</strong> houses in names <strong>of</strong> men and women.• Encouraging coordination among government <strong>of</strong>ficials, district authorities and NGOs.• Seeking <strong>to</strong> facilitate public-private partnerships for economic and infrastructure development.www.sspindia.org142