11.07.2015 Views

A global review of disaster reduction initiatives - Welcome to the ...

A global review of disaster reduction initiatives - Welcome to the ...

A global review of disaster reduction initiatives - Welcome to the ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2Living with Risk: A <strong>global</strong> <strong>review</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>disaster</strong> <strong>reduction</strong> <strong>initiatives</strong>ISDR working group on risk, vulnerability and impact assessment (WG3)Mobilised in 2001 and convened by <strong>the</strong> <strong>of</strong>fice <strong>of</strong> UNDP’s Bureau for Crisis Prevention and Recovery(BCPR) in Geneva, WG3 <strong>of</strong> teh Inter-agency Task Force on Disaster Reduction consists <strong>of</strong> overtwenty members representing UN agencies, academic institutions, international NGOs and relatedregional and national bodies world-wide. The role <strong>of</strong> WG3 has primarily been a forum for dialogueand platform for advocacy, with collaborative activities now underway. Meeting twice annually, WG3acts as a networking system for members and external participants allowing sharing <strong>of</strong> informationregarding various conceptual models and related methodologies coming out <strong>of</strong> leading edge work, aswell as on <strong>the</strong> challenges and lessons learned from practical applications in <strong>the</strong> field.Playing an advocacy role in keeping with <strong>the</strong> relevant priorities <strong>of</strong> ISDR-IATF, WG3 focuses onunderstanding <strong>the</strong> needs for effective risk management, particularly from <strong>the</strong> local and national levels,on small and medium scale <strong>disaster</strong>s and on <strong>the</strong> socio-economic and environmental risks andassociated impact <strong>of</strong> <strong>disaster</strong>s. Fur<strong>the</strong>r, WG3 advocates <strong>the</strong> importance <strong>of</strong> considering <strong>the</strong> practicalapplicability <strong>of</strong> data, concepts, models and mechanisms for reducing risk as well as <strong>the</strong> need for continuallinking <strong>of</strong> <strong>disaster</strong> risk management <strong>to</strong> development planning and vice versa.Currently <strong>the</strong> WG3 is undertaking collective work in key technically-focused areas, including: a)information exchange and documentation; b) indica<strong>to</strong>r, models and data sets for vulnerability indexing;c) <strong>to</strong>ols and best practices for risk, vulnerability at <strong>the</strong> local and urban level; d) improving <strong>disaster</strong>impact analysis; and e) an aggregated analysis linking climate and <strong>disaster</strong> databases.More information is available under <strong>the</strong> http://www.unisdr.org/wgroup3.htm.urban risk scenarios. The IDNDR secretariatlaunched <strong>the</strong> RADIUS initiative in 1996. Itaimed <strong>to</strong> promote world-wide activities for<strong>reduction</strong> <strong>of</strong> urban seismic risk (see boxbelow).In <strong>the</strong> Americas, vulnerability assessment andtechniques (VAT) workshops are being heldunder <strong>the</strong> auspices <strong>of</strong> OAS. They provide anopportunity <strong>to</strong> explore methodological challengesand applicability <strong>of</strong> risk assessments.The technical information and comments generatedby this and similar activities support <strong>the</strong>hemispheric policy work carried out by <strong>the</strong>Working Group on Vulnerability Assessmentsand Indexing (VAI) <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Inter-AmericanCommittee for Natural Disaster Reduction,also a member <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ISDR Inter-Agency TaskForce.Participa<strong>to</strong>ry vulnerability and capacityassessment methodologiesThe relationship between vulnerability andcapacity has been increasingly expressed in riskassessment methodologies in terms <strong>of</strong> Vulnerabilityand Capacities Assessment (VCA). Workhas been done <strong>to</strong> develop, test and validate <strong>to</strong>ols,methodologies and o<strong>the</strong>r instruments for fac<strong>to</strong>ringin issues related <strong>to</strong> social inequity, includinggender analysis, in<strong>to</strong> risk management at <strong>the</strong>local level. These aspects include participa<strong>to</strong>rydiagnosis, training methods, and a number <strong>of</strong>analytical frameworks such as <strong>the</strong> Capabilitiesand Vulnerabilities Analysis (CVA) whichexamines peoples strengths and abilities, as wellas <strong>the</strong>ir susceptibilities, and <strong>the</strong> Socio-Economicand Gender Analysis (SEAGA), which lookat disadvantaged social groups, incorporating74

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!