Fourth National Incidence Study of Child Abuse and Neglect (NIS–4)

TablePage5–4 Differences Related to Family Socioeconomic Status inIncidence Rates per 1,000 Children for EndangermentStandard Maltreatment in the NIS–4 (2005–2006)................................ 5-155–5 Differences in Incidence Rates per 1,000 Children for HarmStandard Maltreatment in the NIS–4 (2005–2006) Related toGrandparents as Caregivers ................................................................... 5-415–6 Differences in Incidence Rates per 1,000 Children for EndangermentStandard Maltreatment in the NIS–4 (2005–2006) Related toGrandparents as Caregivers ................................................................... 5-426–1 Categorization of Perpetrators of Child Maltreatment........................... 6-36–2 Perpetrator’s Relationship to Child and Severityof Harm by the Category of Maltreatment............................................. 6-56–3 Perpetrator’s Sex by Category of Maltreatment and Perpetrator’sRelationship to Child ............................................................................. 6-96–4 Perpetrator’s Sex by Severity of Harm and Perpetrator’sRelationship to Child ............................................................................. 6-106–5 Perpetrator’s Age by Category of Maltreatment andPerpetrator’s Relationship to Child........................................................ 6-126–6 Perpetrator’s Age by Severity of Harm and Perpetrator’sRelationship to Child ............................................................................. 6-137–1 Sources Recognizing Maltreated Children Who Fit the Harm Standardin the NIS–4 (2005–2006) and Comparisons with the EstimatedNumbers from Different Sources in the NIS–3 (1993) ......................... 7-67–2 Sources Recognizing Maltreated Children Who Fit theEndangerment Standard in the NIS–4 (2005–2006) andComparisons with Recognition Sources in the NIS–3 (1993)............... 7-107–3 NIS Coverage of Maltreatment Situations as Indexed bySentinels’ Responses to SDS Vignettes................................................. 7-128–1 Rates of CPS Investigation of Harm Standard Maltreatment, Actualand Presumptive (based on CPS Screening Standards) ......................... 8-288–2 Rates of CPS Investigation of Endangerment StandardMaltreatment, Actual and Presumptive(based on CPS Screening Standards)..................................................... 8-328–3 CPS Investigation Rates for Harm Standard Maltreatment Relatedto Whether a State or Regional Hotline Screens Referrals.................... 8-348–4 CPS Investigation Rates for Harm Standard MaltreatmentRelated to Whether the Agency Provided an Alternative Response...... 8-378–5 CPS Investigation Rates for Endangerment Standard MaltreatmentRelated to Whether the Agency Provided an Alternative Response...... 8-378–6 Percentages of Uninvestigated Children with Harm StandardMaltreatment Recognized by Sentinels in NIS–4 and Percentagesof SDS Sentinels Who Would Not Report the VignetteSituations to CPS ................................................................................... 8-42vi