12.07.2015 Views

Fourth National Incidence Study of Child Abuse and Neglect (NIS–4)

Fourth National Incidence Study of Child Abuse and Neglect (NIS–4)

Fourth National Incidence Study of Child Abuse and Neglect (NIS–4)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Sentinels in only three non-investigatory agency categories had CPSinvestigate the majority <strong>of</strong> the children they recognized as maltreated: social services,public housing, <strong>and</strong> mental health agencies. <strong>Child</strong>ren recognized at social servicesagencies had the highest rate <strong>of</strong> CPS investigation (94%). <strong>Child</strong>ren recognized at publichousing authorities (a new sentinel category in the NIS–4) ranked second with 67%receiving CPS investigation. Here again, as was the case for the Harm St<strong>and</strong>ard findings,this source contributed very few countable children to the NIS, so the bar representingthese children is almost indiscernible in the figure. Among children recognized bymental health sentinels, 53% received investigative attention from CPS.Hospitals ranked fourth among the non-investigatory agencies in theinvestigation <strong>of</strong> children they recognized as maltreated, with only one-quarter <strong>of</strong> thechildren they recognized receiving CPS investigation (25%).Only one-fifth (20%) <strong>of</strong> the children with Endangerment St<strong>and</strong>ardmaltreatment recognized at schools received CPS investigation. In view <strong>of</strong> the sheermagnitude <strong>of</strong> their contribution to the NIS estimates <strong>of</strong> recognized maltreated children,this low investigation rate contributes disproportionately to the investigated versus notinvestigated subgroups. School sentinels rank third as a source <strong>of</strong> investigatedEndangerment St<strong>and</strong>ard children (i.e., the size <strong>of</strong> their contribution to the investigatedpopulation, on the left side <strong>of</strong> the figure). They contribute 17% <strong>of</strong> the total investigatedEndangerment St<strong>and</strong>ard children. In contrast, the contribution <strong>of</strong> school sentinels to theright-h<strong>and</strong> side <strong>of</strong> the figure, which represents the Endangerment St<strong>and</strong>ard children whoare not investigated, far outweighs the contribution <strong>of</strong> all the other groups. Schoolsentinels contribute 52% <strong>of</strong> all the children represented on the right-h<strong>and</strong> side <strong>of</strong> thefigure: the Endangerment St<strong>and</strong>ard children who are not investigated.<strong>Child</strong>ren recognized by pr<strong>of</strong>essional staff in shelters, another new sentinelsource in the NIS–4, <strong>and</strong> those recognized by day care center personnel were unlikely toreceive CPS investigation <strong>of</strong> their maltreatment (only 19% <strong>and</strong> 12%, respectively).As noted above in connection with Figure 8–6, children recognized by “CPSonlySources” can only enter the NIS through a CPS investigation. These children, bydefinition, universally receive CPS investigation. Including these children in the CPSinvestigation rates gives an overestimate <strong>of</strong> the extent <strong>of</strong> CPS investigation <strong>of</strong> countable8–21

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!