12.07.2015 Views

Fourth National Incidence Study of Child Abuse and Neglect (NIS–4)

Fourth National Incidence Study of Child Abuse and Neglect (NIS–4)

Fourth National Incidence Study of Child Abuse and Neglect (NIS–4)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

maltreatment at a reliably higher rate than those living with one parent without a partner(33.0 versus 14.8 children per 1,000), a statistically marginal difference.Inferred harm. 75 Although the rates <strong>of</strong> this outcome appear small, therelative differences across the subgroups are considerable <strong>and</strong> statistically reliable.<strong>Child</strong>ren living in any circumstance other than with their two married biological parentshad significantly higher risks <strong>of</strong> inferred harm from Harm St<strong>and</strong>ard maltreatmentcompared to children living with their two married biological parents. Consistent withthe patterns for other categories <strong>of</strong> maltreatment <strong>and</strong> outcome, the highest risk was forchildren whose single parent had an unmarried partner (3.3 per 1,000). These childrenexperienced maltreatment that warranted the inference they were harmed at 33 times therate <strong>of</strong> children living with two married biological parents.Changes since the NIS–3 in the Distribution <strong>of</strong> Harm St<strong>and</strong>ardMaltreatment Related to Family StructureThe NIS–3 did not obtain information about marital status or the presence <strong>of</strong>an unmarried partner, so analyses could only assess changes in the incidence <strong>of</strong> HarmSt<strong>and</strong>ard maltreatment in relation to whether one or two parents were present in thehousehold. Further, because the NIS–3 included too few sample children who lived withneither parent to provide reliable estimates for most maltreatment categories, 76 thebetween-study analyses compared changes in maltreatment rates for two categories <strong>of</strong>children: those living with two parents <strong>and</strong> those living with a single parent. 77Harm St<strong>and</strong>ard maltreatment. Figure 5–5 shows significant changes sincethe NIS–3 in the overall incidence <strong>of</strong> Harm St<strong>and</strong>ard maltreatment in relation to thisbinary family structure classification. Whereas incidence rates increased for children75 Except for children who lived with a single parent who had no partner, estimates for children in all otherconditions are less reliable because each derives from fewer than 100 sample children.76 NIS–3 data include fewer than 100 sample children who meet the Harm St<strong>and</strong>ard requirements.Endangerment St<strong>and</strong>ard estimates in the NIS–4 derive from fewer than 100 sample children in all but twocategories: overall maltreatment <strong>and</strong> all abuse.77 The definition <strong>of</strong> “parent” here includes step-parents <strong>and</strong> adoptive parents as well as all biologicalparents, regardless <strong>of</strong> their marital status. Appendix E provides the actual estimates <strong>and</strong> results <strong>of</strong> thestatistical tests.5–26

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!