12.07.2015 Views

Fourth National Incidence Study of Child Abuse and Neglect (NIS–4)

Fourth National Incidence Study of Child Abuse and Neglect (NIS–4)

Fourth National Incidence Study of Child Abuse and Neglect (NIS–4)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

emotional neglect incidence may predominantly reflect the heightened CPS attention tothese problems, which are involved in certain types <strong>of</strong> emotional neglect. Furtheranalyses will clarify whether the increases in emotional neglect primarily occurred inspecific types <strong>of</strong> emotional neglect or for children recognized at specific types <strong>of</strong>agencies.Another area where further analyses can illuminate the implications <strong>of</strong> theNIS–4 findings is in the interrelationships among the different factors associated with theincidence <strong>of</strong> maltreatment. Factors such as parents’ labor force participation, householdsocioeconomic status, family size, <strong>and</strong> family structure <strong>and</strong> living arrangement are notonly associated with the incidence <strong>of</strong> maltreatment but are also correlated with eachother. Further analyses could determine their independent relationships to maltreatment,such as whether households with more children have higher incidence rates even whenhousehold socioeconomic status is taken into account. Moreover, for the first time inNIS, the NIS–4 found race differences in the incidence <strong>of</strong> maltreatment, with higherincidence rates for Black children. Similar to the approach used in exploring the NIS–3data (Sedlak & Schultz, 2005), future analyses should examine whether these racedifferences in maltreatment rates remain when the disadvantaging effects <strong>of</strong> these familycircumstances are taken into account.The NIS–4 findings on the strong correlations between socioeconomic status<strong>and</strong> all categories <strong>of</strong> maltreatment are consistent with earlier NIS findings on householdincome. As with the previous results, the recent observations cannot be plausiblyexplained by the claim that lower socioeconomic families are simply more visible to thecommunity pr<strong>of</strong>essionals who provide most <strong>of</strong> the data. The NIS sentinels observesubstantial numbers <strong>of</strong> children <strong>and</strong> families at the middle- <strong>and</strong> upper-income levels. Thepeople who recognize the large majority <strong>of</strong> maltreated children are likely to encountermaltreatment in all income levels, since they include sentinels in hospitals, schools, daycare centers, mental health agencies, voluntary social service agencies, as well aspr<strong>of</strong>essionals not represented by NIS sentinel categories <strong>and</strong> the general public. Sentinelsin schools alone recognized the majority <strong>of</strong> the maltreated children. Although the NISdesign includes only public schools, approximately 90% <strong>of</strong> school-age children attendpublic schools (Shin, 2005), so they represent a broad spectrum <strong>of</strong> socioeconomic statuslevels. Moreover, since the majority (more than 80%) <strong>of</strong> children in private schools(those not reflected in the NIS) are in religiously affiliated schools (Provasnik,KewalRamani, Coleman, Gilbertson, Herring, & Xie, 2007), which frequently have9–2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!