12.07.2015 Views

Fourth National Incidence Study of Child Abuse and Neglect (NIS–4)

Fourth National Incidence Study of Child Abuse and Neglect (NIS–4)

Fourth National Incidence Study of Child Abuse and Neglect (NIS–4)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The NIS–3 found significant increases in both physical <strong>and</strong> emotional neglectunder the Endangerment St<strong>and</strong>ard. The differences in Table 3–3 between the NIS–2 <strong>and</strong>NIS–4 incidence rates reflect these earlier increases as well as the additional increase inEndangerment St<strong>and</strong>ard emotional neglect that occurred since the NIS–3, as noted above.Thus, Endangerment St<strong>and</strong>ard physical neglect <strong>and</strong> emotional neglect were bothsignificantly higher in the NIS–4 2005–2005 study year than they were in 1986 at thetime <strong>of</strong> the NIS–2. Specifically, the total number <strong>of</strong> children who suffered emotionalneglect was 478% higher, while the number <strong>of</strong> children who suffered physical neglectwas 135% higher. In terms <strong>of</strong> incidence rates, there was a 397% increase in the rate <strong>of</strong>emotional neglect <strong>and</strong> a 100% increase in the rate <strong>of</strong> physical neglect under theEndangerment St<strong>and</strong>ard since 1986. As mentioned earlier, statistical tests show that therate <strong>of</strong> educational neglect has not changed since the NIS–2.3.2.5 Severity <strong>of</strong> Outcomes from Endangerment St<strong>and</strong>ardMaltreatment<strong>Child</strong>ren are classified on the basis <strong>of</strong> the most severe injury or harm theysuffered from Endangerment St<strong>and</strong>ard maltreatment. Table 3–4 presents theirdistribution across different degrees <strong>of</strong> injury/impairment. Because each maltreated childappears in only one row <strong>of</strong> this table, the row entries sum to the total number <strong>of</strong> childrenwho were countable under the Endangerment St<strong>and</strong>ard. 34 This section follows the logicalsequence used in preceding sections. The discussion first describes estimates themselves.Next, the presentation examines the Endangerment St<strong>and</strong>ard estimates in relation to theHarm St<strong>and</strong>ard estimates, identifying the percentage <strong>of</strong> the Endangerment St<strong>and</strong>ardestimate that reflects children who were countable under both st<strong>and</strong>ards. The finalparagraphs compare the NIS–4 Endangerment St<strong>and</strong>ard estimates with those from theNIS–2 <strong>and</strong> NIS–3, describing notable changes in incidence across the three studies.34Compare Table 3–4 “Total” with “All Maltreatment” in Table 3–3.3–21

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!