12.07.2015 Views

Fourth National Incidence Study of Child Abuse and Neglect (NIS–4)

Fourth National Incidence Study of Child Abuse and Neglect (NIS–4)

Fourth National Incidence Study of Child Abuse and Neglect (NIS–4)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4.3 Racial <strong>and</strong> Ethnic Differences in the <strong>Incidence</strong> <strong>of</strong>MaltreatmentThis section reports differences in the incidence <strong>of</strong> maltreatment related tothree major racial <strong>and</strong> ethnic groups: White (non-Hispanic), Black (non-Hispanic), <strong>and</strong>Hispanic. 484.3.1 Racial <strong>and</strong> Ethnic Differences in Harm St<strong>and</strong>ardMaltreatmentThe NIS–4 revealed several significant <strong>and</strong> statistically marginal differencesacross the racial/ethnic groups in the incidence <strong>of</strong> Harm St<strong>and</strong>ard maltreatment.Table 4–3 provides the incidence rates for those categories <strong>of</strong> Harm St<strong>and</strong>ardmaltreatment where these racial/ethnic differences emerged. 49,50Overall Harm St<strong>and</strong>ard Maltreatment, <strong>Abuse</strong>, <strong>and</strong> <strong>Neglect</strong>White <strong>and</strong> Black children differed significantly in their rates <strong>of</strong> experiencingoverall Harm St<strong>and</strong>ard maltreatment during the 2005–2006 NIS–4 study year. Anestimated 12.6 per 1,000 White children experienced Harm St<strong>and</strong>ard maltreatmentcompared to 24.0 per 1,000 Black children. Thus, the incidence rate for Black childrenwas nearly 2 times the rate for White children. The rate for Black children was also48 Each <strong>of</strong> the other race categories had too few sample children to support independent estimates for thosegroups (i.e., American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian, Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Isl<strong>and</strong>er, <strong>and</strong>mixed race), so analyses excluded those. <strong>Child</strong>ren in these groups represent a total <strong>of</strong> 11% <strong>of</strong> thosecountable under the Harm St<strong>and</strong>ard <strong>and</strong> 9% <strong>of</strong> the children countable under the Endangerment St<strong>and</strong>ard.The findings also exclude children with missing race/ethnicity information (9% <strong>of</strong> children countableunder the Harm St<strong>and</strong>ard <strong>and</strong> for 15% <strong>of</strong> those countable under the Endangerment St<strong>and</strong>ard).49 In each category <strong>of</strong> maltreatment or injury, decisions about the significance <strong>of</strong> differences relied on theBonferroni critical values for t. This adjusted for the multiplicity <strong>of</strong> the comparisons involved. AppendixD gives details concerning the statistical tests for the significance <strong>of</strong> racial/ethnic group differences.50 The incidence rate calculations used the following denominators, reflecting the average number (inthous<strong>and</strong>s) <strong>of</strong> children in the general population in these groups during 2005 <strong>and</strong> 2006: 42,623 Whitechildren, 10,797 Black children, <strong>and</strong> 14,752 Hispanic children (U.S. Census Bureau, 2008e).4-22

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!