CONSULTING
20160713MSC-WNISR2016V2-LR
20160713MSC-WNISR2016V2-LR
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
traditionally been sited, but also at new inland sites. 496 But this was suspended after Fukushima.<br />
In 2014, a State Council circular discussing the State Council’s Energy Development Strategy<br />
Action Plan (2014-2020) indicated that inland nuclear power still required further research and<br />
proof of safety. 497 The safety rationale for the restriction of construction in inland areas relates to<br />
two different aspects of safety: prevention of severe accidents, and mitigation of the consequences<br />
of a severe accident, should one occur. The public, naturally, is concerned about the potential for<br />
accidents, especially in the areas close to sites selected for reactor construction. 498 There is also<br />
concern about China’s growing water stress and increasing water demand from the power sector.<br />
The resulting debate over the siting of reactors away from the coast has pushed back plans; the<br />
current expectation is that inland nuclear construction will not start before at least 2020. 499<br />
The other significant decision made by policy makers in the aftermath of Fukushima was that<br />
China would build only Generation III or III+ reactors. The initial assumption was that this<br />
stipulation would lead to the adoption of AP1000 technology. In 2011, a general manager in the<br />
China Power Investment Corporation pointed out that the “reactors in the Japanese nuclear power<br />
plants, which have been affected by the massive quake, are Generation II reactors and have to rely<br />
on back-up electricity to power their cooling system in times of emergency”, whereas the “AP1000<br />
nuclear power reactors, currently under construction in China’s coastal areas and set to be<br />
promoted in its vast hinterland, are Generation III reactors and have built in safety features to<br />
overcome such a problem”. 500<br />
However, China’s experience in building the imported AP1000 and EPR designs has been fairly<br />
troubled, with significant delays and cost escalations. 501 The EPR units being built at Taishan were<br />
originally scheduled to “be commissioned at the end of 2013 and in autumn 2014 respectively,<br />
and France’s AREVA had hoped “to have started work on more reactors” by then. 502 None of that<br />
496 Fenglei Du, “Site Selection for Nuclear Power Plants in China”, IAEA, as presented at the Technical<br />
Meeting on Common Challenges On Site Selection For Nuclear Power Plants, Vienna (Austria), 6-<br />
9 July 2010.<br />
497 CNEA, “Guowuyuan bangongting guanyu yinfa nengyuan fazhan zhanlue xingdong jihua (2014nian-<br />
2020nian) de tongzhi, State Council General Office Circular concerning the publication of the Energy<br />
Development Strategy Action Plan (2014-2020)”, China National Energy Administration, 2014, see<br />
http://www.nea.gov.cn/2014-12/03/c_133830458.htm, accessed 2 March 2015.<br />
498 Chris Buckley, “China’s Nuclear Vision Collides With Villagers’ Fears”, New York Times,<br />
21 November 2015, see http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/22/world/asia/chinas-nuclear-vision-collides-withvillagers-fears.html,<br />
accessed 16 June 2016.<br />
499 C. F. Yu, “Construction on Inland Plants Unlikely Before 2020”, NIW, 1 April 2016..<br />
500 WantChinaTimes.com, “China to promote nuclear power despite explosion in Japan”, 13 March 2011,<br />
see http://www.wantchinatimes.com/news-subclass-cnt.aspx?id=20110313000104&cid=1102, accessed<br />
24 March 2015.<br />
501 Chuin-Wei Yap, Brian Spegele, “China’s First Advanced Nuclear Reactor Faces More Delays”, Wall Street<br />
Journal, 15 January 2015, see http://www.wsj.com/articles/chinas-first-advanced-nuclear-reactor-faces-moredelays-1421297393,<br />
accessed 23 March 2015; David Stanway, Kathy Chen, “China’s debut Westinghouse<br />
reactor delayed until June 2017: exec”, Reuters, 9 March 2016, see http://www.reuters.com/article/uschina-parliament-nuclear-idUSKCN0WB09F;<br />
and Wong Lok-to, “Safety Fears Cause Concern Amid Delays to<br />
China’s Taishan Nuclear Plant”, Radio Free Asia, 7 March 2016, see<br />
http://www.rfa.org/english/news/china/safety-03072016114147.html, both accessed 1 July 2016.<br />
502 Harold Thibault, “Construction schedule on Chinese third-generation nuclear plants races ahead of<br />
European models”, The Guardian, 28 December 2010, see<br />
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2010/dec/28/china-areva-taishan-nuclear-thibault, accessed<br />
16 June 2016.<br />
Mycle Schneider, Antony Froggatt et al. 140 World Nuclear Industry Status Report 2016