13.07.2016 Views

CONSULTING

20160713MSC-WNISR2016V2-LR

20160713MSC-WNISR2016V2-LR

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

traditionally been sited, but also at new inland sites. 496 But this was suspended after Fukushima.<br />

In 2014, a State Council circular discussing the State Council’s Energy Development Strategy<br />

Action Plan (2014-2020) indicated that inland nuclear power still required further research and<br />

proof of safety. 497 The safety rationale for the restriction of construction in inland areas relates to<br />

two different aspects of safety: prevention of severe accidents, and mitigation of the consequences<br />

of a severe accident, should one occur. The public, naturally, is concerned about the potential for<br />

accidents, especially in the areas close to sites selected for reactor construction. 498 There is also<br />

concern about China’s growing water stress and increasing water demand from the power sector.<br />

The resulting debate over the siting of reactors away from the coast has pushed back plans; the<br />

current expectation is that inland nuclear construction will not start before at least 2020. 499<br />

The other significant decision made by policy makers in the aftermath of Fukushima was that<br />

China would build only Generation III or III+ reactors. The initial assumption was that this<br />

stipulation would lead to the adoption of AP1000 technology. In 2011, a general manager in the<br />

China Power Investment Corporation pointed out that the “reactors in the Japanese nuclear power<br />

plants, which have been affected by the massive quake, are Generation II reactors and have to rely<br />

on back-up electricity to power their cooling system in times of emergency”, whereas the “AP1000<br />

nuclear power reactors, currently under construction in China’s coastal areas and set to be<br />

promoted in its vast hinterland, are Generation III reactors and have built in safety features to<br />

overcome such a problem”. 500<br />

However, China’s experience in building the imported AP1000 and EPR designs has been fairly<br />

troubled, with significant delays and cost escalations. 501 The EPR units being built at Taishan were<br />

originally scheduled to “be commissioned at the end of 2013 and in autumn 2014 respectively,<br />

and France’s AREVA had hoped “to have started work on more reactors” by then. 502 None of that<br />

496 Fenglei Du, “Site Selection for Nuclear Power Plants in China”, IAEA, as presented at the Technical<br />

Meeting on Common Challenges On Site Selection For Nuclear Power Plants, Vienna (Austria), 6-<br />

9 July 2010.<br />

497 CNEA, “Guowuyuan bangongting guanyu yinfa nengyuan fazhan zhanlue xingdong jihua (2014nian-<br />

2020nian) de tongzhi, State Council General Office Circular concerning the publication of the Energy<br />

Development Strategy Action Plan (2014-2020)”, China National Energy Administration, 2014, see<br />

http://www.nea.gov.cn/2014-12/03/c_133830458.htm, accessed 2 March 2015.<br />

498 Chris Buckley, “China’s Nuclear Vision Collides With Villagers’ Fears”, New York Times,<br />

21 November 2015, see http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/22/world/asia/chinas-nuclear-vision-collides-withvillagers-fears.html,<br />

accessed 16 June 2016.<br />

499 C. F. Yu, “Construction on Inland Plants Unlikely Before 2020”, NIW, 1 April 2016..<br />

500 WantChinaTimes.com, “China to promote nuclear power despite explosion in Japan”, 13 March 2011,<br />

see http://www.wantchinatimes.com/news-subclass-cnt.aspx?id=20110313000104&cid=1102, accessed<br />

24 March 2015.<br />

501 Chuin-Wei Yap, Brian Spegele, “China’s First Advanced Nuclear Reactor Faces More Delays”, Wall Street<br />

Journal, 15 January 2015, see http://www.wsj.com/articles/chinas-first-advanced-nuclear-reactor-faces-moredelays-1421297393,<br />

accessed 23 March 2015; David Stanway, Kathy Chen, “China’s debut Westinghouse<br />

reactor delayed until June 2017: exec”, Reuters, 9 March 2016, see http://www.reuters.com/article/uschina-parliament-nuclear-idUSKCN0WB09F;<br />

and Wong Lok-to, “Safety Fears Cause Concern Amid Delays to<br />

China’s Taishan Nuclear Plant”, Radio Free Asia, 7 March 2016, see<br />

http://www.rfa.org/english/news/china/safety-03072016114147.html, both accessed 1 July 2016.<br />

502 Harold Thibault, “Construction schedule on Chinese third-generation nuclear plants races ahead of<br />

European models”, The Guardian, 28 December 2010, see<br />

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2010/dec/28/china-areva-taishan-nuclear-thibault, accessed<br />

16 June 2016.<br />

Mycle Schneider, Antony Froggatt et al. 140 World Nuclear Industry Status Report 2016

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!