CONSULTING
20160713MSC-WNISR2016V2-LR
20160713MSC-WNISR2016V2-LR
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Shelter Implementation Plan/New Safe Confinement265, 266, 267<br />
Following the construction of the “sarcophagus” above the destroyed unit 4, some additional work<br />
has been carried out in 1997 to minimize the risk of its collapse. A limited stabilization was<br />
achieved with great difficulties in high-radiation levels inside and outside the structure. Safety and<br />
protection of personnel and the environment has been improved since. A Fire Protection System<br />
and an Integrated Automated Control System have been installed with the purpose of monitoring<br />
the status of the shelter, including the “fuel containing material (FCM)” i.e. the corium, collected in<br />
the lower section of the reactor.<br />
Additional work was carried out for the clearing of the site, the demolition of nearby buildings as<br />
well as construction of an “engineering building” for the management and control of all works. Also<br />
a computer-based system was introduced integrating radiation data, information on the structural<br />
integrity of the old shelter, measurements of seismic activities and other parameters important for<br />
the safety on site and for the future operation of the New Safe Confinement (NSC).<br />
A new change facility with a capacity for 1,430 workers has been built which provides medical<br />
screening, training, radiation monitoring, supply of protection equipment as well as an ambulance.<br />
However, these measures would still have not secured the long-term integrity of the structure as<br />
well as site safety. It was then decided to build an additional and major protection structure above<br />
the unit 4. This has been called the NSC.<br />
The entire Shelter Implementation Plan has been financed separately by a new fund (Chernobyl<br />
Shelter Fund) created in 1997 and supported by 44 countries plus the European Union. As with the<br />
other fund, it is administered by EBRD and the project is managed by the Nuclear Safety Account<br />
team.<br />
The word “confinement” is used instead of the traditional “containment” to emphasize the<br />
difference between the “containment” of radioactivity generated in case of an accident, and the<br />
“confinement” of radioactive waste that is the primary purpose of the NSC.<br />
The NSC was designed and is being built by the French consortium Novarka with 50/50 partners<br />
VINCI Construction Grands Projects and Bouygues Travaux Publics. The contract was signed in<br />
August 2007 for an estimated amount of €1.4 billion (US$1.9 billion). Due in particular to the<br />
complexity of the task in a radioactive environment, the budget for completion was increased to<br />
€1.54 billion (US$2.2 billion) in April 2011. It is likely that the final total cost will exceed €1.8 billion<br />
(US$2 billion).<br />
The NSC design is an arch-shaped steel structure that has been designed to cover entirely the<br />
existing sarcophagus (see Figure 31). Requirements included the NSC’s resistance to the impact of<br />
seismic events of a magnitude of level 6, to tornado class 3 and to other heavy winds and snow<br />
loads. The dimensions of the arch were defined based upon the need to operate equipment inside<br />
the NSC and to dismantle the existing “sarcophagus”. A large crane and other remotely controlled<br />
equipment are installed inside and will be used to dismantle the sarcophagus and to attempt to<br />
265 EBRD, “The Chernobyl Shelter Implementation Plan”, Undated, see http://www.ebrd.com/what-wedo/sectors/nuclear-safety/chernobyl-shelter-implementation.html,<br />
accessed 1 July 2016.<br />
266 SSE Chernobyl NPP, “Project ‘New Safe Confinement Construction’”, Undated, see<br />
http://chnpp.gov.ua/en/project-nsc-construction, accessed 1 July 2016.<br />
267 EBRD, “Chernobyl’s New Safe Confinement”, see<br />
http://www.ebrd.com/cs/Satellite?c=Content&cid=1395236547173&d=Default&pagename=EBRD%2FContent%<br />
2FHublet, accessed 1 July 2016.<br />
Mycle Schneider, Antony Froggatt et al. 87 World Nuclear Industry Status Report 2016