13.07.2016 Views

CONSULTING

20160713MSC-WNISR2016V2-LR

20160713MSC-WNISR2016V2-LR

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

around 4.4 m 3 /hour. 270 Therefore, five years after the beginning of the accident, every day, over<br />

300 m 3 of water have to be injected into the three reactor cores.<br />

At unit 1, the building cover for preventing radioactive material diffusion is being dismantled to<br />

enable the removal of spent fuel from the storage pool. According to current planning, debris<br />

removal work will continue until FY2018, and then cranes and handling equipment will be installed<br />

for spent fuel removal by FY2020.<br />

At unit 2, preparation for dismantling the building roof began in April 2016. The method of spent<br />

fuel removal has not been determined yet.<br />

At unit 3, debris is being removed from the building roof and spent fuel pool. Similar to unit 1,<br />

cranes and handling equipment will be installed for spent fuel removal.<br />

The spent fuel removed from unit 1 through 3 will be stored in the common storage pool as in the<br />

case of unit 4. The long-term storage method is planned to be determined around FY2020.<br />

A large number of workers had been exposed to radiation in order to get video footage of the<br />

conditions in the containment vessels. 271 However, from April 2015, radiation surveys using robots<br />

began. For example, 9.7 Sv/h was measured in unit 1 during the first survey. 272 Several of these<br />

robots have only lasted for a few minutes before their electronics including computer chips were<br />

destroyed by the intense radiation fluxes.<br />

As for the measurement of fuel debris, the data obtained from the survey implemented in<br />

March 2015 at unit 1 revealed that there is no significant volume of fuel material in the reactor core<br />

and no progress has been made in collecting detailed data of the fuel debris.<br />

In other words, it remains unknown where the fuel is.<br />

Contaminated Water Management<br />

A dedicated bypass system has been operational since 2014 with pumps underground water into<br />

the sea after analyzing its quality subsequent to storage in temporary storage tanks. 273 As of<br />

March 2016, the inflow of underground water to the reactor building was reduced from around<br />

400 m 3 /day to about 150 to 200 m 3 /day. 274<br />

Since 2 September 2015, Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO) has also started pumping<br />

groundwater using subdrains—41 wells around the buildings and 5 wells on the sea side. Similarly,<br />

270 TEPCO, “The parameters related to the plants in Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station”, see<br />

http://www.tepco.co.jp/en/nu/fukushima-np/f1/pla/2016/images/table_summary-e.pdf, accessed 23 June 2016.<br />

271 For example, 51 workers were needed for the approx. 3-hour video-taping carried out in 2012. This is<br />

most likely because a large number of workers were required to reduce the radiation dose per person amidst<br />

implementing the task involving high-level exposures to radiation. Source: TEPCO, (in Japanese), see<br />

http://www.tepco.co.jp/nu/fukushima-np/images/handouts_121011_08-j.pdf, accessed 12 April 2016.<br />

272 TEPCO, “The development of the reactor containment vessel interior investigation technology”,<br />

30 April 2015, (in Japanese), see http://www.tepco.co.jp/nu/fukushimanp/handouts/2015/images/handouts_150430_01-j.pdf,<br />

accessed 12 April 2016.<br />

273 For example, following are the results of the pre-discharge storage tank samples collected on 5 April 2016:<br />

ND for caesium 134 and caesium 137 and 180Bq/l for tritium. See TEPCO, “The sampling results regarding the<br />

groundwater bypass drainage”, 7 April 2016, (in Japanese), see http://www.tepco.co.jp/nu/fukushimanp/f1/smp/2016/images2/pump_well_16040701-j.pdf,<br />

accessed 12 April 2016.<br />

274 TEPCO, “Current conditions of subdrain and other water treatment facilities”, 31 March 2016, (in Japanese),<br />

see http://www.meti.go.jp/earthquake/nuclear/decommissioning/committee/osensuitaisakuteam/2016/pdf/0331_3_1h.pdf,<br />

accessed 12 April 2016.<br />

Mycle Schneider, Antony Froggatt et al. 90 World Nuclear Industry Status Report 2016

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!