CONSULTING
20160713MSC-WNISR2016V2-LR
20160713MSC-WNISR2016V2-LR
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
decontamination of 1,500 hectares of land containing over 5,550 terabecquerel of activity. A<br />
railway was built to transport the spent fuel by train carriages.<br />
Following the shutdown of the three operating plants, the total inventory accounted for 21,300 fuel<br />
bundles for a weight of 2,700 tons of uranium and 2,000 absorbers, partly still in the three units'<br />
cores, partly kept in the reactor cooling pools as well as transferred to the interim storage facility<br />
ISF-1. The fuel bundles and absorbers are inserted into a transfer flask and carried by a train<br />
carriage to the SFPF at the ISF-2 site. There they are introduced into a hot cell where the fuel bundle<br />
and absorbers are dried by means of a gas dehydration system and cut by means of a specially built<br />
cutting machine.<br />
The Nuhoms system consists of an enclosure vessel comprising canisters forming separate<br />
confinements to prevent the spread of radioactive materials. Spent fuel bundles are introduced in<br />
an internal basket that is then included into a canister. Each canister is placed horizontally in the<br />
Nuhoms casks that are then introduced in individual compartments of the heavy concrete storage<br />
module built at the ISF-2 site. 261<br />
Construction was due to be completed by March 2003. However, construction went on for about<br />
six years of construction until 2006 and several problems had arisen. Despite the near-completion<br />
of the processing building and the concrete housing structures for the Nuhoms casks, the work was<br />
interrupted due to design errors and negligence of the fact that water had penetrated through the<br />
cladding in more than 10 percent of the fuel assemblies. It was also found that the fuel included<br />
some reprocessed uranium and plutonium, for which a different neutron spectrum would require<br />
redesign of the storage shielding. Additional problems were caused by considerable cost overruns,<br />
which raised the investment into the project from an original €68 million (US$64 million) to<br />
€275 million (US$326 million).<br />
In March 2006, US-based Holtec International submitted to ChNPP a feasibility study for drying the<br />
spent fuel that contained water and, in November 2006, conducted successful testing of the drying<br />
facility model. EBRD's Safety Review Group recommended that the donors continue funding the<br />
project with Holtec as the main contractor.<br />
The Framatome ANP contract was terminated in April 2007 262 and following an international audit<br />
and arbitration, the company was requested to pay the client a compensation of €45 million<br />
(US$59.4 million). In September 2007, Holtec signed a contract to complete the ISF-2. The facility's<br />
final design was approved by the Ukrainian Regulator in October 2010.<br />
While still making use of the Nuhoms system, the project implements several Holtec technologies<br />
including an innovative double-wall canister, an advanced forced gas dehydration system, and a hot cell<br />
to dismantle the RBMK fuel assemblies. The first phase of work, which lasted 100 weeks, valued at<br />
slightly over €30 million (US$41 million) involved the preparation of safety and environmental<br />
qualification documents in compliance with Ukrainian norms and standards.<br />
The entire work, scheduled to span nearly eight years, involves the supply of 231 canisters<br />
manufactured at Holtec's plant in Pittsburgh to be delivered between 2016 and April 2019. The<br />
contract includes the construction of the processing facility, numerous physical modifications to<br />
the site, and issuance of the intermediate and final safety analysis reports.<br />
261 SSE Chernobyl NPP, “Interim Spent Nuclear Fuel Dry Storage Facility (ISF-2)”, Undated, see<br />
http://chnpp.gov.ua/en/decommissioning-projects/ongoing-projects/isf-2, accessed 1 July 2016.<br />
262 Le Journal de l’Énergie, “Areva’s incredible fiasco in Chernobyl”, 17 February 2016, see<br />
http://journaldelenergie.com/nucleaire/arevas-incredible-fiasco-in-chernobyl/, accessed 1 July 2016.<br />
Mycle Schneider, Antony Froggatt et al. 85 World Nuclear Industry Status Report 2016