09.12.2012 Views

Understanding the network.pdf - Back to Home

Understanding the network.pdf - Back to Home

Understanding the network.pdf - Back to Home

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

When Fast E<strong>the</strong>rnet first became a standard, it was seen as a backbone technology<br />

due <strong>to</strong> its limited <strong>network</strong> growth capability and short collision domain distance.<br />

However, once Fast E<strong>the</strong>rnet multiport bridges became available, Fast E<strong>the</strong>rnet<br />

product development <strong>to</strong>ok off. When its distance limitations were removed and its<br />

cost came down relative <strong>to</strong> traditional 10Mbps E<strong>the</strong>rnet, Fast E<strong>the</strong>rnet was installed<br />

<strong>to</strong> meet <strong>the</strong> growing bandwidth requirements of Internet, multimedia, and<br />

relational database applications. The utilization of Fast E<strong>the</strong>rnet as a desk<strong>to</strong>p<br />

technology had been foreseen, but not at <strong>the</strong> rate it actually occurred. The<br />

traditional 100+ Mbps backbones based on FDDI (100Mbps), ATM (25 and<br />

155Mbps), and switched Fast E<strong>the</strong>rnet (100Mbps full-duplex) could no longer<br />

provide enough adequate bandwidth for efficient operation. In many cases, <strong>network</strong><br />

administra<strong>to</strong>rs with no real backbone technology alternative <strong>to</strong> increase <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

backbone capacity, enforced 10Mbps-only operating rates for <strong>the</strong> desk<strong>to</strong>p<br />

end-stations on <strong>the</strong>ir LANs.<br />

NOTE<br />

Shared medium transmission pro<strong>to</strong>cols traditionally operate in half-duplex mode,<br />

where stations can ei<strong>the</strong>r send or receive data at one time. With <strong>the</strong> advent of<br />

multiport bridges, it became possible <strong>to</strong> have stations connect <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> multiport<br />

bridge and operate in full-duplex mode, which enables <strong>the</strong> simultaneous<br />

transmission and receipt of data. Full duplex is possible because each port on <strong>the</strong><br />

multiport bridge (in combination with ano<strong>the</strong>r nodes) represents a collision domain.<br />

If only one host is attached <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> bridge port, <strong>the</strong> need for collision detection is<br />

removed, because only <strong>the</strong> bridge and <strong>the</strong> host are communicating. Communication<br />

with o<strong>the</strong>r hosts is managed across <strong>the</strong> multiport bridge's internal bus, so <strong>the</strong><br />

bridge's port essentially acts as a transmission proxy for <strong>the</strong> remote host who is<br />

connected <strong>to</strong> ano<strong>the</strong>r port on <strong>the</strong> bridge.<br />

Although <strong>the</strong> IEEE could not have predicted all <strong>the</strong> effects Fast E<strong>the</strong>rnet has wrought,<br />

<strong>the</strong>y did realize that a need for an even faster E<strong>the</strong>rnet transport existed. In late<br />

1995, an IEEE study group was formed, and by <strong>the</strong> middle of 1998, a Gigabit<br />

E<strong>the</strong>rnet standard 802.3z was completed. Recognizing <strong>the</strong> need for a faster<br />

backbone technology, <strong>the</strong> IEEE specifically prioritized <strong>the</strong> development of a fiber<br />

optic based standard over traditional copper media. They did this for two reasons.<br />

The first was technical: The highest rated copper media did not offer adequate<br />

bandwidth, but fiber optic media did provide more than adequate bandwidth. This<br />

also permitted <strong>the</strong> utilization of existing fiber optic based, high-speed data<br />

transmission standards as a foundation for <strong>the</strong> Gigabit standard development<br />

(which was done with <strong>the</strong> development of <strong>the</strong> Fast E<strong>the</strong>rnet standard). The second<br />

reason was <strong>the</strong> perceived initial demand for <strong>the</strong> application of Gigabit E<strong>the</strong>rnet: <strong>to</strong><br />

replace existing fiber-based LAN backbones that were already using fiber optic cable<br />

for <strong>the</strong> transmission of FDDI, ATM, and Fast E<strong>the</strong>rnet.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!