10.12.2012 Views

Grasslands of the World.pdf - Disasters and Conflicts - UNEP

Grasslands of the World.pdf - Disasters and Conflicts - UNEP

Grasslands of the World.pdf - Disasters and Conflicts - UNEP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

132<br />

Figure 4.5<br />

Biozones <strong>of</strong> Patagonia , from Paruelo, Jobággy <strong>and</strong> Sala (1998).<br />

(Reproduced with permission <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> authors <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> editors <strong>of</strong> Ecología Austral)<br />

<strong>Grassl<strong>and</strong>s</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> world<br />

(physiognomic) characteristics <strong>of</strong> dominant plant life-forms (Cabrera, 1971;<br />

Soriano, 1983; León et al., 1998; Roig, 1998) or phytosociological approaches<br />

as <strong>the</strong> main grouping criteria (Collantes, Anchorena <strong>and</strong> Cingolani, 1999;<br />

Golluscio, León <strong>and</strong> Perelman, 1982; Boelcke, Moore <strong>and</strong> Roig, 1985).<br />

Recently, Paruelo, Jobbágy <strong>and</strong> Sala (1998b) classified <strong>the</strong> vegetation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

region on <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> functional characteristics, using productivity -related<br />

indices derived from NOAA satellite imagery analysis (Figure 4.5 <strong>and</strong><br />

Table 4.1). An advantage <strong>of</strong> this approach is that it provides a functional upto-date<br />

classification <strong>of</strong> vegetation, reflecting <strong>the</strong> current state <strong>of</strong> rangel<strong>and</strong>s,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!