10.12.2012 Views

Grasslands of the World.pdf - Disasters and Conflicts - UNEP

Grasslands of the World.pdf - Disasters and Conflicts - UNEP

Grasslands of the World.pdf - Disasters and Conflicts - UNEP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The changing face <strong>of</strong> pastoral systems in grass-dominated ecosystems <strong>of</strong> eastern Africa 39<br />

are particularly oriented toward marketing: selling animals, milk <strong>and</strong> hides regularly.<br />

Herds are managed in a way that minimizes sales because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> traditional<br />

social <strong>and</strong> economic functions <strong>of</strong> livestock o<strong>the</strong>r than income generation<br />

(Coppock, 1994). In most pastoral areas, livestock are used as a social “safety<br />

net”, with livestock exchange cementing mutual obligations to help each o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

in times <strong>of</strong> need. Like many o<strong>the</strong>r pastoral areas, cattle are also <strong>of</strong> particular<br />

significance in <strong>the</strong> Borana area <strong>of</strong> Ethiopia as a symbol <strong>of</strong> wealth <strong>and</strong> prestige,<br />

<strong>and</strong> owners are reluctant to sell. Sheep <strong>and</strong> goats are usually sold to raise cash<br />

for household needs. Although marketing <strong>of</strong> livestock products (milk, meat ,<br />

hides) in pastoral systems is a relatively new phenomenon, pastoral peoples<br />

who live near markets <strong>and</strong> roads are increasingly selling products.<br />

Traditionally, herders consume a large part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> milk produced; any surplus<br />

is shared with neighbours, exchanged in barter or sold in urban areas. In<br />

Somalia , a commercial milk chain through a cooperative has been established<br />

by <strong>the</strong> pastoralists for marketing camel milk in Mogadishu as a source <strong>of</strong><br />

income to buy sugar, clo<strong>the</strong>s <strong>and</strong> medicines (Herren, 1990). An EU-funded<br />

project, Streng<strong>the</strong>ning food security through decentralized cooperation, active<br />

from 1996 to 2002, also supported establishment <strong>of</strong> a small processing plant for<br />

pasteurizing camel milk <strong>and</strong> marketing <strong>the</strong> resulting products in suitable packaging<br />

for <strong>the</strong> Somali market (EC, 2000). The 2001–2 drought had a considerable<br />

effect on camel calving intervals <strong>and</strong> milk sales. In some parts <strong>of</strong> Somalia, <strong>the</strong>re<br />

was virtually no income from milk sales following <strong>the</strong> drought. Milk formerly<br />

provided approximately 40 percent <strong>of</strong> a household’s income <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> return on<br />

livestock sales, which typically provide an additional 40 percent <strong>of</strong> income, was<br />

halved after <strong>the</strong> drought (FSAU, 2003). Maasai in Kenya <strong>and</strong> Tanzania living<br />

close to main roads or towns sell fresh milk, butter or fermented milk. The<br />

Borana in sou<strong>the</strong>rn Ethiopia sour cow’s milk <strong>and</strong> process it into butter for sale<br />

in local markets or for transport to large cities (Holden <strong>and</strong> Coppock, 1992).<br />

Distance to market, season <strong>and</strong> wealth <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> household (which is directly<br />

related to <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> livestock owned) influence marketing <strong>of</strong> dairy products<br />

in <strong>the</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>rn rangel<strong>and</strong>s <strong>of</strong> Ethiopia (Coppock, 1994).<br />

Most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> extensive grassl<strong>and</strong>s in <strong>the</strong> region are ei<strong>the</strong>r under <strong>the</strong> control <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> government <strong>and</strong> designated as wildlife <strong>and</strong> conservation areas for national<br />

parks (about 10 percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> l<strong>and</strong> area) or are open access or common property<br />

resources . Access to <strong>the</strong>se resources <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> conditions under which <strong>the</strong>y<br />

can be used are under national laws, but frequently traditional l<strong>and</strong> use rights<br />

are granted by local communities . Traditionally, long-term sustainability <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong>se rangel<strong>and</strong>s has been ensured by agreed management norms, but <strong>the</strong>se<br />

are increasingly breaking down as l<strong>and</strong>s privatize, crop farmers migrate to<br />

pastoral areas <strong>and</strong> human needs grow. Governments are also reducing support<br />

to pastoral peoples, who are <strong>of</strong>ten marginalized in national affairs (IFAD,<br />

1995). Options for income generation <strong>and</strong> alternative l<strong>and</strong> uses for extensive<br />

grassl<strong>and</strong>s for pastoralists are limited <strong>and</strong> can lead to overutilization <strong>and</strong> l<strong>and</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!