10.12.2012 Views

Grasslands of the World.pdf - Disasters and Conflicts - UNEP

Grasslands of the World.pdf - Disasters and Conflicts - UNEP

Grasslands of the World.pdf - Disasters and Conflicts - UNEP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

54<br />

<strong>Grassl<strong>and</strong>s</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> world<br />

tall vegetatively propagated grass species, while <strong>the</strong> short sexually reproduced<br />

species disappeared (Belsky, 1986). This implies that even though <strong>the</strong> greatest<br />

number <strong>of</strong> species are found at intermediate grazing intensities, some species<br />

are always lost when ungrazed pastures are grazed. Although <strong>the</strong>re are more<br />

species at intermediate levels <strong>of</strong> grazing, it is possible that any grazing negatively<br />

affects rare plant species that are sensitive to grazing.<br />

Desertification : driven by climate or overgrazing by livestock?<br />

One <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> most controversial <strong>and</strong> debated aspects <strong>of</strong> research about pastoral<br />

systems is <strong>the</strong> existence <strong>and</strong> extent <strong>of</strong> overgrazing, desertification <strong>and</strong> l<strong>and</strong><br />

degradation 4 in pastoral l<strong>and</strong>s, particularly in Africa. Global assessments <strong>of</strong><br />

dryl<strong>and</strong>s maintain that much <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> earth’s l<strong>and</strong> surface is degraded (GLASOD,<br />

1990) <strong>and</strong> that livestock are <strong>the</strong> principal global cause <strong>of</strong> desertification<br />

(Mabbutt, 1984). Analysts suggest that African pastures are 50 percent more<br />

degraded than those in Asia or Latin America (GLASOD, 1990). However,<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r analyses show that livestock numbers only exceed likely carrying<br />

capacities <strong>of</strong> arid <strong>and</strong> semi -arid rangel<strong>and</strong>s in about 3–19 percent 5 <strong>of</strong> Africa<br />

(Ellis et al., 1999). In addition, <strong>the</strong>re is no sustained evidence for a reduction<br />

in productivity , as measured by no change in <strong>the</strong> water-use efficiency <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Sahelian vegetation over 16 years, suggesting that <strong>the</strong> extent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Sahara<br />

is more strongly influenced by drought than grazing (Tucker, Dregne <strong>and</strong><br />

Newcomb, 1991; Nicholson, Tucker <strong>and</strong> Ba, 1998).<br />

However, <strong>the</strong>se broad assessments are only correlative <strong>and</strong> can not assess<br />

cause <strong>and</strong> effect rigorously, <strong>and</strong> can not measure <strong>the</strong> relative impacts <strong>of</strong> different<br />

causative agents. Certainly, at more local scales, livestock impacts are<br />

highly visible <strong>and</strong> persistent around towns, water points <strong>and</strong> along cattle<br />

tracks (e.g. Georgiadis, 1987; Hiernaux, 1996). More illuminating – but much<br />

more difficult to acquire – are two types <strong>of</strong> evidence: (1) remote sensing studies<br />

at <strong>the</strong> l<strong>and</strong>scape scale, tracking <strong>the</strong> extent <strong>of</strong> degradation or desertification<br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> sufficient duration to cover drought <strong>and</strong> non-drought periods; <strong>and</strong><br />

4 Definitions <strong>of</strong> desertification, overgrazing <strong>and</strong> degradation are controversial <strong>and</strong><br />

problematic. We use <strong>the</strong> term desertification here to refer to <strong>the</strong> concepts used by <strong>the</strong> cited<br />

global assessment (GLASOD, 1990). We use degradation to mean an irreversible change in<br />

ecosystem state or function. We agree with de Queiroz (1993) that “degradation” has been<br />

defined relative to human management objectives <strong>and</strong> thus is relative; for example, a change<br />

from grassl<strong>and</strong> to bushl<strong>and</strong> is “degradation” to a cattle -keeper but may be “aggradation”<br />

from <strong>the</strong> perspective <strong>of</strong> carbon sequestration . We would prefer a set <strong>of</strong> quantitative measures<br />

that can assess <strong>the</strong> state <strong>of</strong> a particular piece <strong>of</strong> l<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> be used by l<strong>and</strong> managers to assess<br />

<strong>the</strong> desirability <strong>of</strong> different changes from <strong>the</strong> context <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir own management objectives.<br />

We define overgrazing here as any level <strong>of</strong> herbivore grazing that induces ei<strong>the</strong>r temporary<br />

or permanent changes in <strong>the</strong> species composition or function <strong>of</strong> a grassl<strong>and</strong>.<br />

5 Carrying capacity is exceeded in 19% <strong>of</strong> areas receiving 0–200 mm rainfall per annum, 15%<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 200–400 mm zone, 3% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 400–600 mm zone <strong>and</strong> 8.5% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 600–800 mm zone<br />

(Ellis et al., 1999).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!