10.12.2012 Views

Grasslands of the World.pdf - Disasters and Conflicts - UNEP

Grasslands of the World.pdf - Disasters and Conflicts - UNEP

Grasslands of the World.pdf - Disasters and Conflicts - UNEP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

58<br />

<strong>Grassl<strong>and</strong>s</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> world<br />

fragmentation prevents both livestock <strong>and</strong> wildlife from reaching parts <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> l<strong>and</strong>scape ; <strong>of</strong>ten <strong>the</strong> fenced parts contain key resources like swamps <strong>and</strong><br />

riverine areas. Impacts on wildlife are not entirely known, but decreases in<br />

population sizes <strong>and</strong> viability can be expected. Eventually, fragmentation can<br />

completely exclude species from an area.<br />

Impacts <strong>of</strong> expansion <strong>of</strong> cultivation <strong>and</strong> settlement<br />

Recent evidence suggests that <strong>the</strong> impact <strong>of</strong> cultivation on vegetation , wildlife<br />

<strong>and</strong> soils in pastoral ecosystems is greater than that <strong>of</strong> livestock. Expansion <strong>of</strong><br />

cultivation fragments rangel<strong>and</strong> l<strong>and</strong>scapes when farmers convert rangel<strong>and</strong> into<br />

cropl<strong>and</strong> (Hiernaux, 2000). L<strong>and</strong> degradation through crop cultivation has been<br />

documented (Niamir-Fuller, 1999), but <strong>the</strong> impacts <strong>of</strong> livestock use <strong>and</strong> crop<br />

cultivation (or any o<strong>the</strong>r l<strong>and</strong> uses) has rarely been compared. The conversion<br />

<strong>of</strong> savannah to cultivation in parts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Mara ecosystem <strong>of</strong> Kenya, along<br />

with poaching <strong>and</strong> drought , has caused more than a 60 percent loss in resident<br />

wildlife populations in <strong>the</strong> Mara ecosystem in <strong>the</strong> last 20 years (Ottichilo et al.,<br />

2000; Homewood et al., 2001; Serneels, Said <strong>and</strong> Lambin, 2001).<br />

In non-cultivated areas, mixed livestock-wildlife systems may be more<br />

productive than ei<strong>the</strong>r wildlife-only or livestock-only systems (Western,<br />

1989). These mixed systems, when maintained at moderate livestock grazing<br />

levels, coupled with pastoral rangel<strong>and</strong> burning , may support higher levels <strong>of</strong><br />

plant <strong>and</strong> animal biodiversity than livestock-only or wildlife-only systems,<br />

analogous to <strong>the</strong> increase in plant diversity seen at <strong>the</strong> edge <strong>of</strong> wildlife reserves<br />

frequented by pastoralists <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir livestock (Western <strong>and</strong> Gichohi, 1993).<br />

Fur<strong>the</strong>r, it is hypo<strong>the</strong>sized that when livestock populations are moderate in<br />

size or mobile , pastoralism produces significant global benefits in <strong>the</strong> form<br />

<strong>of</strong> biodiversity conservation , carbon sequestration , soil retention, soil fertility<br />

maintenance <strong>and</strong> catchment protection.<br />

Estimates <strong>of</strong> how <strong>the</strong> expansion <strong>of</strong> cultivation will affect pastoral systems<br />

over <strong>the</strong> next half century are based on scenarios <strong>of</strong> human population growth<br />

<strong>and</strong> climate change for <strong>the</strong> year 2050 from Reid et al. (2000a) <strong>and</strong> Thornton et al.<br />

(2002). Surprisingly, <strong>the</strong>se changes may bring about an absolute expansion <strong>of</strong> cultivation<br />

<strong>of</strong> only 4 percent, or a relative increase <strong>of</strong> about 15 percent (Figures 2.8<br />

<strong>and</strong> 2.9). Most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> change will probably occur around <strong>the</strong> edges <strong>of</strong> currently<br />

cultivated l<strong>and</strong> in areas with <strong>the</strong> most rainfall . Thus pastoral areas are expected to<br />

continue to contract fur<strong>the</strong>r in <strong>the</strong> future <strong>and</strong> pastoral peoples to ei<strong>the</strong>r continue<br />

to adopt agropastoralism or become restricted to drier <strong>and</strong> drier l<strong>and</strong>.<br />

Carbon sequestration<br />

It is not clear whe<strong>the</strong>r current changes in <strong>the</strong> eastern Africa n rangel<strong>and</strong>s<br />

(l<strong>and</strong> use change, overgrazing, fragmentation) are causing a net release or net<br />

accumulation <strong>of</strong> carbon, ei<strong>the</strong>r above or below ground. Expansion <strong>of</strong> cultivation<br />

into rangel<strong>and</strong>s probably strongly reduces carbon below ground, but may

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!