10.12.2012 Views

Grasslands of the World.pdf - Disasters and Conflicts - UNEP

Grasslands of the World.pdf - Disasters and Conflicts - UNEP

Grasslands of the World.pdf - Disasters and Conflicts - UNEP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

332<br />

<strong>Grassl<strong>and</strong>s</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> world<br />

340 000 lived in poverty prior to <strong>the</strong> severe 1997–98 winter; in <strong>the</strong> following<br />

year <strong>the</strong> percentage had increased to 40 percent.<br />

Officials label heavy snowfalls <strong>and</strong> severe winters as “disasters”; however,<br />

pastoralists have been herding on <strong>the</strong> Tibetan Steppe for centuries <strong>and</strong> have<br />

dealt with snowstorms <strong>and</strong> cold wea<strong>the</strong>r – those <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> winter <strong>of</strong> 1997–1998<br />

are natural events <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> pastoral system. Herding has always been a highrisk<br />

enterprise; pastoralists adopt strategies that minimize risk <strong>and</strong> make best<br />

use <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> resources (Goldstein <strong>and</strong> Beall, 1990; Miller, 1998a). In contrast<br />

to severe droughts in semi -arid pastoral areas, heavy snowfalls do not affect<br />

<strong>the</strong> vegetation negatively. Unlike droughts, where <strong>the</strong> effects on livestock are<br />

more prolonged, severe snowstorms are sudden events, with a very short or no<br />

“warning” period, <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong>ten causing livestock deaths in days or weeks.<br />

DILEMMA ON THE TIBETAN STEPPE<br />

With attempts to transform pastoral livestock production towards a market<br />

economy <strong>the</strong> goal has been to increase <strong>of</strong>f-take. This has been promoted<br />

through privatization <strong>of</strong> herds <strong>and</strong> l<strong>and</strong>, settling herders, introduction <strong>of</strong> less<br />

mobile , intensive grazing management <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> rainfed forage. Many <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se<br />

interventions have been responses to political or economic objectives <strong>and</strong> while<br />

<strong>the</strong>y have improved <strong>the</strong> delivery <strong>of</strong> social services, in many instances, <strong>the</strong>y conflict<br />

with <strong>the</strong> goal <strong>of</strong> maintaining grassl<strong>and</strong> health <strong>and</strong> stability since <strong>the</strong>y limit<br />

<strong>the</strong> mobile nature <strong>of</strong> pastoralism (Miller, 1999a; Goldstein <strong>and</strong> Beall, 1989; Wu,<br />

1997a). Movements between seasonal pastures are being reduced or eliminated;<br />

herd composition is being restructured along commercial lines; herders are<br />

being compelled to become livestock farmers. The environment <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> pastoral<br />

cultures are under threat where mobility has been eliminated or substantially<br />

reduced (Humphrey <strong>and</strong> Sneath, 1999; Sneath <strong>and</strong> Humphrey, 1996).<br />

A disproportionate amount <strong>of</strong> research is oriented to maximizing livestock<br />

productivity , ra<strong>the</strong>r than underst<strong>and</strong>ing how livestock fit into <strong>the</strong> ecological<br />

system in a socially sustainable way. There is also a problem regarding <strong>the</strong><br />

effective privatization <strong>of</strong> pastoral l<strong>and</strong> tenure . Transaction costs associated with<br />

<strong>the</strong> policy are high, including high private costs relative to <strong>the</strong> benefits <strong>and</strong> high<br />

public costs <strong>of</strong> monitoring <strong>and</strong> enforcing contractual provisions related to pasture<br />

management (<strong>World</strong> Bank, 2001). As Banks (1999) has outlined, privatization<br />

policy was based on <strong>the</strong> assumption that, through <strong>the</strong> better definition <strong>of</strong><br />

property rights <strong>and</strong> introduction <strong>of</strong> individual l<strong>and</strong> tenure, security would be<br />

improved <strong>and</strong> this would prevent a “tragedy <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> commons” scenario which<br />

in turn would give herders <strong>the</strong> incentive to manage <strong>the</strong>ir pasture better <strong>and</strong><br />

invest in improvement . It was asserted that private ownership, by combining<br />

interest in both l<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> livestock, would prevent overgrazing (Banks, 1997).<br />

This model has been widely rejected by most pastoral specialists, who have<br />

found it a very poor guide to underst<strong>and</strong>ing transhumant pastoralism <strong>and</strong> planning<br />

development <strong>of</strong> pastoral areas.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!