10.12.2012 Views

Grasslands of the World.pdf - Disasters and Conflicts - UNEP

Grasslands of the World.pdf - Disasters and Conflicts - UNEP

Grasslands of the World.pdf - Disasters and Conflicts - UNEP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The South American Campos ecosystem 197<br />

With increasing levels <strong>of</strong> FO , ground cover increases; as leaves increase in<br />

relation to stems, forage <strong>and</strong> animal production also increase. The PAR/SP<br />

[Secondary Production] relationship nearly doubles when FO changes from<br />

4.0 to 12.0 percent LW. Maximum LW is attained at lower stocking rates , which<br />

are exactly those that promote high DLWG , related to high AR <strong>and</strong> light grazing<br />

. The Primary Aerial Productivity (PAP):SP relationship had an efficiency<br />

<strong>of</strong> 4.48 percent with an FO <strong>of</strong> 4.0 percent, reaching 4.66 percent with an FO <strong>of</strong><br />

12.0 percent, as a consequence <strong>of</strong> increased DLWG . Lighter grazing pressures<br />

allow tall species to make important contributions to increase animal diet quality,<br />

<strong>and</strong> also protects native fauna.<br />

Optimal utilization ranges for natural grassl<strong>and</strong>s can be derived from a curvilinear<br />

response model , promoting productivity <strong>and</strong> ensuring sustainability ,<br />

which is attained by higher utilization efficiency <strong>of</strong> incident PAR (Table 5.6<br />

<strong>and</strong> Figure 5.3). Optimal utilization ranges are estimated from FOs <strong>of</strong> 13.5 percent<br />

<strong>of</strong> LW (maximum DLWG per head) to 11.5 percent <strong>of</strong> LW (maximum<br />

LW), where <strong>the</strong>re is compromise between individual <strong>and</strong> per-hectare production.<br />

As <strong>the</strong>re is considerable variation between <strong>the</strong> nutritional requirements<br />

<strong>of</strong> species <strong>and</strong> classes <strong>of</strong> animal (cow+calf, ewe+lamb, heifers, steers, bulls,<br />

horses, etc.) each pasture has to be managed according to <strong>the</strong> specific animal<br />

class requirements. Stocking rate <strong>and</strong> carrying capacity can only be defined as<br />

a function <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> animal product involved <strong>and</strong> cannot be fixed, because <strong>the</strong>y<br />

depend on environmental variations.<br />

Table 5.7 can be prepared as a function derived from <strong>the</strong> grassl<strong>and</strong> optimization<br />

model , which reflects natural grassl<strong>and</strong> grazing optimization <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

stocking rate that this pasture could feed at optimal carrying capacity . In <strong>the</strong><br />

warm season – a nearly 200-day grazing period for natural grassl<strong>and</strong> – <strong>the</strong>se<br />

results adjust to <strong>the</strong> animal product yield equation in <strong>the</strong> following way:<br />

Yield = Quality × Quantity<br />

Liveweight/ha (LW) = DLWG × Animal-day/ha<br />

146 kg = 0.517 kg × 282<br />

Forage harvest from natural grassl<strong>and</strong>s could be improved , representing an<br />

annual increase <strong>of</strong> 784 000 t live weight, without cost, in Rio Gr<strong>and</strong>e do Sul<br />

alone through <strong>the</strong> recommended strategy <strong>of</strong> high FO to <strong>the</strong> grazing animal,<br />

TABLE 5.7<br />

Natural grassl<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> animal performance in <strong>the</strong> optimal utilization range.<br />

Parameters Responses<br />

DM/ha/day (kg) 16.30 (evaluated)<br />

Animal-day/ha 282 (counted)<br />

Daily LWG (kg) 0.517 (evaluated)<br />

Liveweight gain /ha (kg) 146 (calculated)<br />

Carrying capacity 1.17 two-year-old steers (calculated)<br />

Stocking rate (kg/ha) 370 (observed)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!