SLC Thesis Template - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University ...
SLC Thesis Template - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University ...
SLC Thesis Template - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>The</strong>y believed that, thanks to their general‟s adroitness, this enterprise<br />
was better timed than if he had led them there straight from the field<br />
so fatal to the Aeneadae.<br />
Duff, 1989, 185.<br />
<strong>The</strong> structure of Cornelius Nepos‟ Hannibal biography suggests, but does not directly<br />
state, that Hannibal did march on Rome after Cannae. Where Chapter 4 of the biography<br />
closes with Hannibal‟s victory at Cannae, in an interesting juxtaposition the next<br />
sentence opens Chapter 5 with Hannibal‟s march on Rome:<br />
Hac pugna pugnata Romam profectus nullo resistente in propinquis<br />
urbi montibus moratus est. Cum aliquot ibi dies castra habuisset et<br />
Capuam reverteretur Q Fabius Maximus dictator Romanus in agro<br />
Falerno ei se obiecit.<br />
Cornelius Nepos, Hann. 5.1<br />
After having fought that battle, Hannibal advanced on Rome without<br />
resistance. He halted in the hills near the city. After he had remained<br />
in camp there for several days and was returning to Capua, the Roman<br />
dictator Quintus Fabius Maximus opposed himself to him in the<br />
Falernian region.<br />
Rolfe, 1984, 265.<br />
On the other hand, Cornelius Nepos is explicit that Hannibal was returning to Capua. It<br />
might be that Nepos condenses time which concurs with the overall summarising style<br />
of the biography or there might be missing text which would also explain hac pugna<br />
pugnata. Nepos‟ placement of Fabius opposing Hannibal after Hannibal‟s march on<br />
Rome is another variation on the historiographical tradition and not necessarily an error,<br />
especially as Nepos‟ text is incomplete. It may be indicative of the number of extant<br />
traditions about of these events and demonstate how some features of Hannibal‟s<br />
exploits may have become dislocated from their historical chronology.<br />
Risks for later Roman generals<br />
Spencer‟s assessment 240 that there are no extant comparisons of Sulla to Hannibal for<br />
marching an army on Rome seems true enough, although that is a common feature<br />
between the two men. <strong>The</strong>re is one extant text, Statius‟ Silvae, that draws a connection<br />
between Sulla and Hannibal, but it is not drawn through their common actions but<br />
through their supposed consecutive ownership of a statuette of Hercules:<br />
240 Spencer, 2002, 157.<br />
96