SLC Thesis Template - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University ...
SLC Thesis Template - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University ...
SLC Thesis Template - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Appendix 2: <strong>The</strong> importance of names<br />
Polybius‟ first named Roman in the Histories is Appius Claudius (Consul 264) and the<br />
first named Carthaginian is Hannibal‟s father, Hamilcar Barca (Hist. 1.11; 1.13).<br />
Polybius demonstrably manipulated his text in order to name Hamilcar first because<br />
prior to this passage, Polybius referred to the Carthaginians only in general terms and<br />
therefore avoided naming Hanno whom he knew to be the „Carthaginian commander‟ in<br />
Histories 1.11 because he referred back to Hanno in that role at Histories 1.16. By the<br />
same token, the choice of Appius Claudius is deliberate, (if nothing else, he had a<br />
colleague, Fulvius), and, in this instance, it might be connected to contemporary second<br />
century politics. In 184, an Appius Claudius headed a commission to investigate and<br />
report on the Achaean League, and Polybius may have intended to flatter him through<br />
prioritising his ancestor and family name (cf. Livy, 34.33).<br />
As quoted in the Introduction to this thesis, the first named figure in Livy‟s third<br />
decad is Hannibal followed by the Roman people as a community: quod Hannibale duce<br />
Carthaginienses cum populo Romano gessere (Livy, 21.1.1). <strong>The</strong> first and the last<br />
Roman names in the third decad are both Scipio (Livy, 21.6, the father, Publius<br />
Cornelius Scipio; Livy, 30.45, his more famous son, Scipio Africanus). <strong>The</strong> literary<br />
decision to make „Scipio‟ the first Roman name in the decad required Livy to prioritise<br />
a tradition which he believed to be anachronistic over when, exactly, the Saguntines sent<br />
envoys to Rome to request assistance: Consules tunc Romae erant P. Cornelius Scipio et<br />
Ti. Sempronius Longus (Livy, 21.6.3).<br />
Livy delayed discussion of the chronological problem until nearly ten chapters later<br />
well after the initial impact of the Scipio name has passed. Livy noted that these two<br />
men were consuls in 218, whereas other sources (including Polybius) stated that the<br />
siege of Saguntum began in 219, in which case, these they could not have been the<br />
consuls (Livy, 21.15.2-6). <strong>The</strong>refore Livy was aware of the chronological problem and<br />
its convenient implication that the siege of Saguntum did not last as long as suggested<br />
by others; he also indicates his dissatisfaction and criticism of the historicity of the<br />
source text through the phrase: quae si ita sunt – if this is so (Livy, 21.15.4). Livy‟s<br />
decision to discuss the chronology at all indicates to his audience that his text is<br />
carefully arranged to suit his particular presentation.<br />
232