SLC Thesis Template - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University ...
SLC Thesis Template - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University ...
SLC Thesis Template - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
the same family have held such a command various other possibilities for authors arise,<br />
such as, whether to represent one, two, or all three men, as autonomous tyrant-figures or<br />
as „good kings.‟ Of course, no-one directly states that the family held autonomous rule<br />
in Spain, particularly in the narrative sequences around the siege and fall of Saguntum<br />
(because it undermines the justification for Rome‟s war with Carthage). Quotations of<br />
the Ebro treaty only refer to the „Carthaginians‟ and presentations of disagreements over<br />
the validity or otherwise of the treaty refer to it exclusively in terms of the relations<br />
between Rome and Carthage (Hist. 3.20.6; 21.1-3; 33.1-4; Livy, 21.18.4-12; Pun. 1.693-<br />
4). 127 Yet, Cornelius Nepos‟ biographies of Hamilcar and Hannibal are placed under a<br />
heading of kings; the poet Statius refers to Hannibal as a king (Silv. 4.6.75). 128 Similarly<br />
Hannibal‟s rise to power in Nepos‟ biography is reported to Carthage as fait accompli:<br />
hoc quoque interfecto, exercitus summam imperii ad eum detulit. Id Karthaginem<br />
delatum publice comprobatum est (Nepos, Hann. 3.1). One of Polybius‟ literary<br />
portraits also suggests that Hannibal held some level of autonomy similar to kingship<br />
following his rise to power in Spain (Hist. 23.13). <strong>The</strong> establishment of dominions and<br />
founding cities 129 in Spain may or may not be under sanction from Carthage. In<br />
addition, Hannibal‟s marriage to an elite woman from a Spanish tribe may represent<br />
active participation in royal status whilst ensuring the loyalty of her tribe; Silius Italicus<br />
gives her a long and sacred lineage (Pun. 3.62-65; 3.97-100).<br />
Hannibal‟s predecessor, Hasdrubal, is a shadowy intermediate figure and<br />
representations of him differ markedly, but all are negative. Polybius‟ quotation of<br />
Fabius Pictor indicates an early tradition presenting Hasdrubal as no less aggressive than<br />
Hamilcar and Hannibal. Furthermore, after gaining power in Spain, Hasdrubal<br />
apparently attempted to establish a monarchy at Carthage but was blocked by rivals and<br />
returned to Spain which he ruled independently. In this tradition, Hasdrubal‟s ambition<br />
and love of power was considered one of the causes of the Second Punic War as his<br />
successor, Hannibal, admired his principles and adopted the same policies (Hist. 3.8.1-<br />
5). While Polybius criticises many of Fabius Pictor‟s interpretations, on this occasion he<br />
agrees that Hamilcar Barca inspired both Hasdrubal and Hannibal with hatred for Rome,<br />
126 See discussion in Green, 1989, 202 and Spencer, 2002, 157-9..<br />
127 Scholars differ over the level of autonomy for the Barcids in Spain; see Hoyos, 1998, 150 n1. <strong>The</strong><br />
concern in this thesis is the literary presentation of these figures.<br />
128 Gruen, 1984, 354 n197; Seibert, 1993, 5, 13 cite a letter purporting to be from Hannibal that styles<br />
him as „king of the Carthaginians;‟ it offers a prize for the best poem about Hannibals‟ victories but is<br />
considered to be a first century BC parody.<br />
129 See discussion in Hoyos, 2006, Introduction, xiv-xv.<br />
44