the importance to Livy of enabling his reader to visualise a scene. 40 <strong>The</strong>re is increasing recognition that Livy constructed his work consciously and intentionally to promulgate a vision of the past that addresses his and his readers‟ contemporary needs and interests. While Jaeger‟s Livy’s Written Rome is not specifically focussed on Hannibal and the third decad, her discussion on the importance of the physical city to Livy is developed in chapter three of this thesis in respect of Livy‟s development of a theme of Hannibal marching on Rome. 41 This theme, according to the argument of this thesis, pervades the first pentad and has the effect of repeatedly returning the reader‟s attention to the physical city. If Livy has suffered in comparison to Polybius in terms of historical analysis, it is nothing compared to the scathingly dismissive treatment meted out on Silius Italicus, particularly in early to mid-twentieth century British scholarship on the quality of the Punica. 42 Indeed, the Punica is not listed in the CAH Introduction 43 on sources for the Punic Wars, nor is it included in the subsection of non-historical literature! Silius Italicus is often ignored by modern historians studying Hannibal or the Second Punic War because the Punica is considered an „unreliable‟ source: „scarcely usable as history.‟ 44 While this might be true for the actual events of the Second Punic War and, to some extent, their chronological sequence, the poem is a valuable source of evidence for first century AD attitudes to Hannibal and the Romans he faced. <strong>The</strong> same may be said of the works of other non-historiographical authors and poets who refer to Hannibal, such as Horace, Seneca, Statius, Juvenal and Martial. 45 Martial‟s positive opinion of Silius Italicus has traditionally been given less credence than a negative interpretation of a comment by Pliny about the great care Silius took to write poetry: scribebat carmina maiore cura quam ingenio (Pliny, Ep. 3.7; Martial, Ep. 8.66.2). 46 Attitudes toward Silius began to change during the latter half of the twentieth century, and, as noted by Pomeroy and Wilson, Pliny may have been applying his own 40 Miles, 1995; Jaeger, 1997; Feldherr, 1998; Moore, 2000, 487; Jaeger, 2000, 232; Rossi, 2004, 359-81. 41 Jaeger, 1997; also review by Keaveney, 1999, 92. 42 E.g. Moore, 1921, 105 „honest dullness;‟ Nicol, 1936; 1999, 293; Campbell, 1936, 57; Butler, 1909, 236: „the longest and worst of the surviving Roman epics,‟ and 244: „Silius rolls on lumbering and unperturbed.... he has all the faults of Ovid... none of the merits of Vergil.‟ 43 Astin, 1951, 10; 1989, 11. 44 Hoyos, 2008, 7. 45 For a few references to Hannibal among these texts: Horace, Odes, 2.12.1; 3.6.34; 4.4.49; 4.8.15; Epode, 16.8; Statius, Silvae, 4.6.78, 107; 4.3.4; 4.6.75, 85; Martial, 4.14; 9.43; 9.44;13.73. See also Nisbet and Rudd, 2004. 46 NB. Although not the focus of this thesis, Silius‟ text must have been valued more highly in the past to ensure its transmission. See McGushin, 1985; Reeve, 1983 for history of the transmission of the Punica. 15
apt witticism by echoing Ovid on Callimachus (Am. 1.15.14: quamvis ingenio non valet, arte valet). Given the frequency of Ovidian allusions in the Punica, modern scholars might, Wilson suggests, have misinterpreted Pliny‟s meaning. 47 <strong>The</strong>se interpretations by Wilson and Pomeroy are representative of increasing scholarly recognition of the complexities within the Punica, as Silius Italicus, writing nearly three hundred years after the Second Punic War, takes the well-known and well-documented story into the mythical realm. As Goldberg wrote, „when stories are well-known and literature abundant, the poet can put greater emphasis on the telling than on the tale.‟ 48 Scholars such as Ahl, Davis and Pomeroy, Dominik, von Albrecht, McGuire, Hardie, Wilson and Augoustakis have, in various ways, contributed to countering the claim that Silius Italicus „lacks originality.‟ 49 It is well established that Silius Italicus responds to a variety of earlier texts 50 including his epic predecessors. 51 Of these epic predecessors, Virgil‟s Aeneid and Lucan‟s de Bello Civili have attracted most attention, 52 with Von Albrecht describing Silius Italicus as applying „integral components of former epic, especially from the Aeneid, to illuminate crucial passages of his work, skilfully inserting them as gems, as it were, into his historical mosaic.‟ 53 What has not been revisited in terms of recent scholarship on Silius Italicus is a possible relationship between his text and the tradition in Polybius‟ Histories. As far as the historical information is concerned, Campbell, Nicol, Von Albrecht, and McGuire conclude that Silius Italicus primarily, but not exclusively, used Livy. 54 Burck 55 too, 47 Wilson, 2004, 227 n7. Pomeroy, 1989, 139 n78; 119 „Pliny is no admirer of Silius;‟ 2000, 151. 48 Goldberg, 1995, 50. 49 Nicol, 1936, 3 „Silius lacks originality;‟ 1999, 293. Campbell, 1936, 57 „[Silius is] little more than versification of Livy;‟ also Santini, 1991, 1. Contra: Ahl, Davis, Pomeroy, 1986, 2493; Pomeroy, 2000; Matier, 1990, 7 „Silius shows great ingenuity in his adaptations of the historical material;‟ Wilson, 1993, 2004; Hardie, 1989, 3; Feeney, 1991, 302. Commentary: Spaltenstein, 1986. Other (positive) works on the Punica: Von Albrecht, 1997, 959-971; Pomeroy, 1989a; McGuire, 1997; Wilson, 2004; Dominik, 2003, 2006; Augoustakis, 2003, 2006; Marks, 2005, 110-213 argues that Silius moves from „many‟ to „one‟ (Scipio) to contend with Hannibal; Klaasen, 2006, 1-4 review of Marks. 50 Ahl, Davis, and Pomeroy, 1986; Pomeroy, 1989a, notes tributes by Silius Italicus to other authors such as Statius, Cicero and Q. Asconius Pedianus. For inter-textuality with other texts: McGuire, 1997 for Flavian epic generally; Von Albrecht, 1997, 301-309 and Wilson, 2004 for Ovid; Barnes, 1995, 287-291; Hardie, 1989, 1993 and Pomeroy, 2000 for Virgil. Also Boyle & Sullivan, 1991, 297-304; Wilson, 1993. 51 Boyle, 1993, Preface, xi; Goldberg, 1995, esp. chapters 1, 2; Barnes, 1995; Hinds, 1998; McGuire, 1997; Wilson, 2004. 52 See Ahl, Davis, and Pomeroy, 1986; Pomeroy, 1989a. Also Hardie, 1993, 64 for connections between the Punica with the Aeneid and Lucan; Von Albrecht, 1997, 963 summarises scholarship on the influences of the Aeneid on the structure of the Punica; 964 summarises scholarship on the influence of the bellum civile on the Punica. 53 Von Albrecht, 1997, 963. 54 Campbell, 1936, 57; Von Albrecht, 1997, 293 „Livy takes pride of place,‟ McGuire, 1997, 53. Nicol, 1936, concludes that Livy was the main source for the history in the poem. 55 Burck, 1984; reviewed by Feeney, 1985, 390-1. 16
- Page 1 and 2: http://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz
- Page 3 and 4: Abstract There are many stories abo
- Page 5 and 6: Table of Abbreviations Latin and Gr
- Page 7 and 8: Hannibal almost duels with Aemilius
- Page 9 and 10: Acknowledgements My first heartfelt
- Page 11 and 12: to produce a historical study of th
- Page 13 and 14: published in the Flavian period. Th
- Page 15 and 16: offers a more plausible historical
- Page 17 and 18: second century were entertained wit
- Page 19: There is, of course, deep appreciat
- Page 23 and 24: features in their texts to prioriti
- Page 25 and 26: among the greatest stumbling blocks
- Page 27 and 28: historiographical tradition but may
- Page 29 and 30: accompanying scenes of titillation,
- Page 31 and 32: at the opening of this Introduction
- Page 33 and 34: eferences are found within speeches
- Page 35 and 36: Polybius states that Hamilcar Barca
- Page 37 and 38: within the third decad by concludin
- Page 39 and 40: her final imprecation that Carthage
- Page 41 and 42: ack into mythical time. The Barca f
- Page 43 and 44: haec inter iuncto religatus in ordi
- Page 45 and 46: claims that Hannibal had avenged th
- Page 47 and 48: previously beaten enemy, and that t
- Page 49 and 50: the same family have held such a co
- Page 51 and 52: Polybius and Livy. 130 Initially, S
- Page 53 and 54: Chapter 2: Hannibal appropriates He
- Page 55 and 56: ut iste volunt (Livy, 21.10.8). Mor
- Page 57 and 58: In the Phoenician or Carthaginian p
- Page 59 and 60: Presently the wondrous treasure bec
- Page 61 and 62: to Hamilcar; his preference is unex
- Page 63 and 64: tracks, disguising movements, layin
- Page 65 and 66: travelling from Spain to Italy). In
- Page 67 and 68: Progress is slow in the Punica beca
- Page 69 and 70: (Hist. 3.48.12). He debunks any pre
- Page 71 and 72:
forces, 191 sending some to Spain (
- Page 73 and 74:
These differences arise in part fro
- Page 75 and 76:
Livy presents Rome‟s resistance t
- Page 77 and 78:
Polybius, Livy and Silius Italicus
- Page 79 and 80:
Multa secum quonam inde ire pergere
- Page 81 and 82:
inflicted on those captured by Hann
- Page 83 and 84:
significant roles in each of the ot
- Page 85 and 86:
In this quote Livy echoes Cato‟s
- Page 87 and 88:
Representations of Hannibal threate
- Page 89 and 90:
„debellata procul, quaecumque voc
- Page 91 and 92:
immediately following has turned to
- Page 93 and 94:
ηαπ ηα δὲ πξ μαο δη
- Page 95 and 96:
Where Livy‟s Hannibal gains a new
- Page 97 and 98:
Livy‟s presentation allows for an
- Page 99 and 100:
Trasimene than after Cannae. One un
- Page 101 and 102:
They believed that, thanks to their
- Page 103 and 104:
Pompey: „you are our last resort:
- Page 105 and 106:
eference to Mithridates‟ courtier
- Page 107 and 108:
epresentation is very indirect. It
- Page 109 and 110:
have been better for Rome than vict
- Page 111 and 112:
Representing Hannibal’s leadershi
- Page 113 and 114:
Descriptive lists summarising the o
- Page 115 and 116:
Inde rursus sollicitari seditione m
- Page 117 and 118:
In the other part of the field Paul
- Page 119 and 120:
death in battle added glory to the
- Page 121 and 122:
initially slow: segne primo (Livy,
- Page 123 and 124:
haud secus ac, fractae rector si fo
- Page 125 and 126:
πάληα δ᾽ ἦλ ηὰ πα
- Page 127 and 128:
followed by expiation rites as pres
- Page 129 and 130:
Silius Italicus uses omens to conne
- Page 131 and 132:
observe: „the differences between
- Page 133 and 134:
Chapter 5: Invading Campania, 217 a
- Page 135 and 136:
Besides the above advantages the wh
- Page 137 and 138:
Cum satis sciret per easdem angusti
- Page 139 and 140:
text is that everything is well org
- Page 141 and 142:
apida iam subdita peste virgulta at
- Page 143 and 144:
characteristic that Polybius notes
- Page 145 and 146:
ark, not surrendering until they re
- Page 147 and 148:
The people suddenly seized the Pref
- Page 149 and 150:
joining other senators with their f
- Page 151 and 152:
Silius Italicus, however, has the f
- Page 153 and 154:
Effects of Capuan luxury Hannibal d
- Page 155 and 156:
Nec Venerem interea fugit exoptabil
- Page 157 and 158:
compatriots from Spain, these deser
- Page 159 and 160:
Chapter 6: Hannibalis sat nomen era
- Page 161 and 162:
The claim was disputed in ancient t
- Page 163 and 164:
Livy stresses the importance of thi
- Page 165 and 166:
Fortune 360 will provide a means fo
- Page 167 and 168:
political climate of Augustan Rome
- Page 169 and 170:
about the same time: Romam per eosd
- Page 171 and 172:
Mother (Livy, 29.10.4-5). After con
- Page 173 and 174:
to recall Hannibal. The description
- Page 175 and 176:
namque gravis curis carpit dum noct
- Page 177 and 178:
„Turn the ships‟ prows back tow
- Page 179 and 180:
Whether Rome or Carthage should giv
- Page 181 and 182:
ὄθξα θαὶ νὐθ ἐζέ
- Page 183 and 184:
fingenti qua volt flectit (Livy, 30
- Page 185 and 186:
the gods by conducting it so well.
- Page 187 and 188:
Adesse finem belli ac laboris, in m
- Page 189 and 190:
does Scipio. Appian closes the scen
- Page 191 and 192:
other protagonists involved in a co
- Page 193 and 194:
arrangement of the text, Hannibal e
- Page 195 and 196:
Cum in apparando acerrime esset occ
- Page 197 and 198:
qui nunc servatas evertat funditas
- Page 199 and 200:
Livy‟s presentation of Hannibal i
- Page 201 and 202:
Hannibal the Scapegoat and Warmonge
- Page 203 and 204:
shelter. Hannibal sailed out in the
- Page 205 and 206:
direct speech by Hannibal to Antioc
- Page 207 and 208:
Hannibal unus, cuius eo tempore vel
- Page 209 and 210:
Somewhat less credible is the detai
- Page 211 and 212:
Sic vir fortissimus, multis variisq
- Page 213 and 214:
Cornelius Nepos similarly depicts F
- Page 215 and 216:
The Sibyl predicts that Hannibal wi
- Page 217 and 218:
Missus Hannibal in Hispaniam primo
- Page 219 and 220:
By nature he was eager for action a
- Page 221 and 222:
Conclusions There are a number of c
- Page 223 and 224:
It is interesting to note that epis
- Page 225 and 226:
and pietas, with Polybius and Corne
- Page 227 and 228:
The fifth chapter compared treatmen
- Page 229 and 230:
Livy and Polybius who depict Hannib
- Page 231 and 232:
Figure 1: Kraay, Pl.112 No 332 Figu
- Page 233 and 234:
Figure 5: ‘Hannibal,’ Museo Arc
- Page 235 and 236:
Appendix 1: Omen lists for Cannae,
- Page 237 and 238:
Appendix 2: The importance of names
- Page 239 and 240:
attle; occasionally naming the comm
- Page 241 and 242:
It is with the final word at the cl
- Page 243 and 244:
Bibliography Ancient texts and tran
- Page 245 and 246:
Polybius, Histories V, translated b
- Page 247 and 248:
Barnes, W. R., 1995, „Silius Ital
- Page 249 and 250:
Dominik, W. J., 2003, „Hannibal a
- Page 251 and 252:
Hoyos, Dexter, 1999, „A modern vi
- Page 253 and 254:
Morgan, M. G., 1972, „Polybius an
- Page 255 and 256:
Seymour Forster, Edward, 1995, (tra