SLC Thesis Template - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University ...
SLC Thesis Template - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University ...
SLC Thesis Template - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
within the third decad by concluding with Hannibal‟s defeat at Zama. <strong>The</strong> division<br />
between decads which separates the Second Punic War from Hannibal‟s later life<br />
fighting Romans from within the courts of eastern kings also separates the realisation<br />
that Hannibal maintains fides to his oath from the initial introduction.<br />
Livy‟s second insertion of the anecdote, in the fourth decad, is in a similar context to<br />
the one used by Polybius, as part of a conversation between Hannibal and Antiochus<br />
(Livy, 35.19.2). Livy‟s adaptation is different; it is not to hint at fides, but to emphasise<br />
Hannibal‟s role as a warmonger as he successfully incites Antiochus to warfare against<br />
the Romans. <strong>The</strong> depiction is strengthened by Hannibal‟s closing statement that if<br />
Antiochus failed to meet expectations, Hannibal would seek arms elsewhere. Once<br />
Antiochus was defeated, Hannibal evaded capture and later reappeared fighting for King<br />
Prusias of Bithynia against Rome.<br />
<strong>The</strong>re is another version of the oath story related by the Tiberian writer, Valerius<br />
Maximus, which explicitly upholds Hannibal as an external example to illustrate the<br />
Roman virtue of fides in its personal sense. Thus Hannibal is explicitly linked to the<br />
internal Roman examples who show fiducia sui, including Cato and Scipio (Val. Max.,<br />
3.7. ext. 6). <strong>The</strong> anecdote is placed in the familiar context of Hannibal in conversation<br />
with a king (Prusias of Bithynia) but the difference from the historiographical texts, and<br />
possibly due to genre, is that the arguments are fuller, making the overall sense of the<br />
conversation more plausible. Hannibal argues that when it came to the stratagems of<br />
warfare and military leadership against the Romans, Prusias needed a man with<br />
Hannibal‟s experience. Hannibal supports his claim with references to his successful<br />
Alpine crossing, his victories at Lake Trasimene and Cannae, as well as taking Capua.<br />
This mode of presentation highlights Hannibal‟s successes as unlikely and strange<br />
omissions from those representations that purport to be historical, particularly in<br />
Polybius‟ text.<br />
Cornelius Nepos, living through the turmoil of the late republic, also openly respects<br />
Hannibal for his fides to his oath and never renouncing his hatred of the Romans (Hann.<br />
1.1-3). <strong>The</strong> oath-swearing anecdote is located near the beginning of the Hannibal<br />
biography and in a similar context to Polybius‟ presentation of Hannibal justifying his<br />
loyalty to Antiochus (Hann. 3.2-6). By using the anecdote in the same introductory<br />
context as Polybius, Nepos highlights the subtext that Polybius, the Greek hostage at<br />
32