SLC Thesis Template - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University ...
SLC Thesis Template - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University ...
SLC Thesis Template - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>The</strong>re is, of course, deep appreciation for Livy‟s literary composition but the statement<br />
that „Livy would want to be judged on his literary style‟ 35 is only partially valid and now<br />
outdated. Livy wrote an annalistic history of Rome with a specific moralistic approach<br />
and would expect judgement on content too (Livy, 1.1). As Tacitus noted, style and<br />
honesty were both required in a historian (Ann. 4.34). Livy wrote in part „to admire and<br />
to enshrine the deeds of the men who made Rome‟ 36 but also in admiration of the city of<br />
Rome itself as indicated by his title ab urbe condita and his first Preface (Livy, 1.1).<br />
This fundamental basis to Livy‟s text explains many of the differences between his<br />
presentation and those of other authors, including Polybius and Silius Italicus, as time<br />
and again Livy‟s presentation of events in the third decad returns the reader‟s focus to<br />
the physical city of Rome.<br />
Luce‟s work on the architectural and symmetrical nature of Livy‟s text highlights the<br />
importance of structure as a „dedication and a reflection of the architectural and<br />
decorative symmetry of the city that had become monumental in Livy‟s own time.‟ 37<br />
Luce argued that Livy‟s narrative is a product of the choices he made from his available<br />
sources which are worked into the symmetry of his structure and these choices are made<br />
not only in terms of which historical record to follow. 38 This broad assessment of Livy‟s<br />
technique also appears in Moore‟s comparison of Livy and Polybius for the<br />
characterisations of certain (Roman) figures through specific Roman virtues. 39 <strong>The</strong><br />
comparisons made in the fifth chapter of this thesis indicate that Livy expands<br />
considerably on the various forms and meanings of fides as presented by Polybius in<br />
reference to the story of Capua and other towns in Italy responding to Hannibal after<br />
Cannae. Although not directly related to Hannibal, and hence not discussed in depth in<br />
this thesis, it is a topic that could be explored in future research.<br />
More recently, Livian scholarship has taken other factors into account, such as the<br />
importance of the physical city to the monumental and political nature of the text, and<br />
35 Usher, 1969, 180. Briscoe, 1973, 17 describes Livy 33.45.7 as highly poetical; Livy, 33.48 as written in<br />
a free-flowing almost Herodotean style. „Had he had time to revise the passage, one feels, the inelegancies<br />
would have been removed.‟<br />
36 Marincola, 1997, 29.<br />
37 Luce, 1977, 139. For other discussions on the structure in Livy‟s text, see Mellor 1999, 75; Feldherr,<br />
1998; Miles, 1995; Jaeger, 2000; Kraus and Woodman, 1997, 51-81. In historical terms see Hoyos, 2006,<br />
xxii-xxvi.<br />
38 Luce, 1977, 139; also Wiseman, 1979, 50.<br />
39 Moore, 1989, 149-151 argues that, in some cases, Livy translates Polybius directly but, in other cases,<br />
Livy changes the virtue to a different one, showing that Livy felt no obligation to praise his characters in<br />
the same terms used by his sources.<br />
14