SLC Thesis Template - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University ...
SLC Thesis Template - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University ...
SLC Thesis Template - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>The</strong> enemy at the gates in 211<br />
Hoyos argues that, if Hannibal had been serious about taking the city, he was „…five if<br />
not six years too late.‟ 197 This point is less important to authors than taking the only<br />
opportunity in the Second Punic War to present the city of Rome itself under attack.<br />
Any comparison between Hannibal‟s attack on Rome and the most famous event<br />
from ancient epic, the siege of Troy, seems, on the face of it, to be limited, but Silius<br />
Italicus draws a comparison in Punica 1. <strong>The</strong> brief description of the Palatine as<br />
surrounded and besieged by Hannibal goes somewhat beyond what other texts record of<br />
Hannibal‟s attack:<br />
sed medio finem bello excidiumque vicissim<br />
molitae gentes, propiusque fuere periclo<br />
quis superare datum: reseravit Dardanus arces<br />
ductor Agenoreas obsessa Palatia vallo<br />
Poenorum ac muris defendit Roma salutem.<br />
69<br />
Pun. 1.12-16<br />
But in the second war each nation strove to destroy and exterminate<br />
her rival and those to whom victory was granted came nearer to<br />
destruction: in it a Roman general stormed the citadel of Carthage, the<br />
Palatine was surrounded and besieged by Hannibal and Rome made<br />
good her safety by her walls alone.<br />
Duff, 1996, 5.<br />
Dardanus is an archaism that alludes to the Trojan myth cycle, and in Homeric poetry,<br />
Troy was famed for the strength of her walls. Hence the description of Rome being<br />
saved by the strength of her walls alone (line 16) indicates that Rome is the stronger of<br />
the two cities.<br />
Whether or not the historical Hannibal‟s overall strategy included taking the city of<br />
Rome remains an open, and probably unresolvable, question but historical issues are not<br />
main point of this discussion. 198 <strong>The</strong>re are fundamental structural differences between<br />
Livy, Polybius and Silius Italicus arising, in part, from the relative importance each<br />
author places on Hannibal‟s march on Rome in 211.<br />
197 Hoyos, 2003, 136.<br />
198 Hannibal had neither the resources in manpower or equipment to attack a well-defended city such as<br />
Rome without additional support from Carthage or other allies. Walbank, 1.421, Lazenby, 1996, 41, and<br />
Shean, 1996, 180-1 argue that he did not intend to attack Rome. Lancel, 1998, 96 agrees, noting that<br />
Hannibal was equipped for a war of mobility, not a static war against a well-fortified city. Hoyos, 2003,<br />
116 argues that the Carthaginian fleet off Pisa, Hist. 3.96.8-10, intended to link with Hannibal for a<br />
combined attack on Rome.