SLC Thesis Template - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University ...
SLC Thesis Template - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University ...
SLC Thesis Template - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
about the same time: Romam per eosdem dies et Magonem et Hannibalem profectos<br />
adlatum est (Livy, 30.21.1).<br />
Silius Italicus elides Mago‟s invasion, the details of the battle and his wound. Mago‟s<br />
defeat is implied in Punica 16 with the reference that he was deprived of his camp and<br />
sailed back to Africa, driven by fear: iam Mago, exutus castris, agitante pavore in<br />
Libyam proper tramisit caerula velo (Pun. 16.26-7).<br />
Hannibal leaves Italy<br />
<strong>The</strong> capture of Syracuse by Marcellus was a hugely significant contribution to the<br />
Roman war effort which cast a long shadow over Hannibal‟s chances of overall victory<br />
in Italy (Livy, 25.23-41; Pun. 14; Plutarch, Marcellus, 18.3). It would have impacted to<br />
some extent on Hannibal‟s supply routes because control of Syracuse enabled the<br />
Romans to maintain at least some form of naval blockade of the shortest, safest sea-<br />
route between southern Italy and Carthage. Livy devotes much of book 25 to Marcellus‟<br />
successes in Sicily, and Silius Italicus, too, acknowledges the importance of Marcellus‟<br />
contribution by devoting an entire Book, Punica 14, to the capture of Syracuse. Its<br />
possibly ahistorical location in the Punica after the fall of Capua (Livy places it prior to<br />
the fall of Capua) might be a poetic response to Polybius‟ discussion about the Roman<br />
plundering of Syracuse which is located in the Histories 9 after the fall of Capua<br />
(Polybius‟ narrative about the events prior to the capture of Syracuse is no longer<br />
extant). 364<br />
Polybius is initially highly critical of the Roman plundering of Syracuse, arguing that<br />
things that have nothing to do with material wealth should be left in their place. He<br />
points out that by removing not just the gold and silver, but every possible item from the<br />
defeated Syracusans the victors engender rage, jealousy and hatred; his criticsm of the<br />
Roman abuse of power is very thinly veiled (Hist. 9.10).<br />
Silius Italicus seems to respond to this sentiment in Polybius‟ text. <strong>The</strong> epic<br />
Marcellus recognises that he has the power to decide what will remain standing and<br />
what will be removed; he restrains his men‟s greed. This portrait differs from the one in<br />
Livy who says that the city was given over to the soldiers as soon as guards had been<br />
posted at the houses of those who had supported the Romans (Livy, 25.31.8-.11). <strong>The</strong><br />
epic Syracusans were so grateful to Marcellus for his restraint that he was compared to<br />
364 See also Plutarch, Marcellus, 19.3; Val. Max. 8.7. Ext. 7.<br />
164