SLC Thesis Template - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University ...
SLC Thesis Template - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University ...
SLC Thesis Template - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
takes Petelia (Livy, 23.15.3; 23.30.1). Despite repeated attempts, Hannibal cannot<br />
capture either Nola or Neapolis, both strategically critical towns. 354<br />
Livy depicts Hannibal losing something of his leadership qualities through his<br />
inability to prevent his men leaving to visit their Capuan girlfriends (Livy, 23.18.16)<br />
whereas Silius Italicus illustrates the same problem differently to Livy. It is not<br />
Hannibal‟s men taking unauthorised leave but Hannibal who leaves his men to continue<br />
the siege of Puteoli while he went sight-seeing around the hot springs of Baiae with the<br />
Capuan nobility (Pun. 12.104-115). Not surprisingly the siege ends in failure (as it did<br />
in Livy, 24.13.6). <strong>The</strong> Punica is the earliest extant text that locates Hannibal at the spa<br />
resort of Baiae, but, as with the surprising number of items in common between the<br />
Punica and later texts such as Florus and Appian that are not found elsewhere, it is<br />
impossible to know whether it reflects a common tradition used by Silius, Appian and/or<br />
Florus, or whether it reflects the influence of the Punica on these later texts.<br />
Marcellus successfully held Nola against Hannibal (Livy 23.15.7), and later gains the<br />
first significant victory against Hannibal (Livy 23.44-45.4). It is the first major morale<br />
boosting battlefield victory for Rome after Cannae that gave rise to the quip Capuam<br />
Hannibali Cannas fuisse (Livy, 23.45.4). <strong>The</strong> victory signals a change in Roman<br />
fortunes and Marcellus was subsequently rewarded with full military authority as<br />
proconsul as only he had recorded success against Hannibal in Italy (Livy, 23.30.19).<br />
Silius Italicus epicised Marcellus‟ win by having him challenge Hannibal to single<br />
combat (Pun. 12.198) except that Juno intervened to ensure Hannibal did not fight (Pun.<br />
12.201). This point becomes significant for the tradition of Hannibal‟s record of<br />
victories in Italy, discussed in more detail in the next chapter.<br />
Appian gives another reason that concurs with the depiction of Hannibal weakening,<br />
and relates it to the Roman successes in Spain. Hannibal‟s fortunes are said to decline<br />
from 215 (coinciding with taking control of Capua) because Spanish fighters coming to<br />
Italy to fight on behalf of Rome conversed with their compatriots in Hannibal‟s army,<br />
persuading many of them to join the Romans (Appian, Hann. 7.30). Livy and Plutarch<br />
also refer to Spanish fighters deserting Hannibal after 215, but not by persuasion from<br />
354 Contra Frederiksen, 1984, 242 who argues that Livy confused his sources: „the first two are Coelian<br />
and sound, the third is clearly a doublet of the first. <strong>The</strong> motive is repeated eisdem verbis; the capture of<br />
Nuceria must precede the revolt of Capua, since Roman supporters from Nuceria cannot get into Capua<br />
„quod portas Hannibali clausissent,‟ 23.15.6. Livy has muddled the praetor‟s arrival at Casilinum with his<br />
later move to Nola (23.14.10-13). <strong>The</strong> source is thus non-Coelian, otherwise unknown.‟<br />
151