SLC Thesis Template - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University ...
SLC Thesis Template - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University ...
SLC Thesis Template - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
accompanying scenes of titillation, and, indeed, it will be shown that the differences<br />
between the texts tend to lie in which moral(s) or aspects of a moral an author chose to<br />
emphasise as missing or perverted among the Capuans, as well as Hannibal.<br />
A famously emblematic representation of Hannibal is as an „eternal enemy‟ of Rome<br />
(Appian, Hann. 1). Both Appian and Polybius introduce Hannibal to their texts in this<br />
guise, whereas it becomes a role that Hannibal gradually grows into across two decads<br />
in Livy, or assigned to him at Zama in Silius Italicus and Cornelius Nepos. <strong>The</strong> theme of<br />
Hannibal as a sworn enemy of Rome is discussed in the final chapter of this thesis.<br />
Following Zama, Hannibal is presented in a variety of guises, including, for some, that<br />
of a saviour of Carthage. Livy‟s depiction of Hannibal as a saviour of Carthage is<br />
adapted to present his audience with another example of Punic trickery. Cornelius<br />
Nepos and Silius Italicus opt for an alternative tradition, one in which Hannibal does not<br />
accept the defeat as final but swears to continue warfare, an „eternal enemy‟ openly<br />
keeping to his oath. An eternal enemy may be considered as a representative of dark<br />
forces, for every positive there must be a negative in order to achieve balance. <strong>The</strong> glory<br />
of Rome requires a powerful dark force, and this becomes Hannibal.<br />
Over time Hannibal becomes the example by which other enemies are measured; his<br />
name is used far more frequently than Antiochus, or Pyrrhus. For Cicero and Cornelius<br />
Nepos, surrounded by the civil wars of the late republic, Hannibal represented an „ideal‟<br />
or archetypal foreign enemy that Romans of old used to fight, fear and hold in respect.<br />
Cicero has no respect for Antonius, and, as always, applies his analogies with great care<br />
to make pointed judgements about his opponent. In the Philippics he upholds Hannibal<br />
as a paradigm for a worthy enemy against whom Antonius cannot measure. 78<br />
Cicero seems to have steered clear of publicly comparing Caesar and Hannibal but in<br />
the later imperial period others were less circumspect. Liebeschuetz argued for<br />
similarities between Lucan‟s Caesar and Hannibal. 79 McGuire identifies passages in the<br />
Punica that seem to characterise Hannibal and allude to Caesar. 80 As noted above, Silius<br />
Italicus used omens to connect Cannae with the historical battle at Pharsalus, and in<br />
particular to connect the Roman army at Cannae with the Pompeians at Pharsalus. By<br />
78 Billot, 2005a: Cicero compares Antonius poorly against Hannibal on 9 occasions in Philippics I, V, VI,<br />
XIII and XIV, but he does not see Antonius as „another‟ Hannibal as in Lancel, 1998, 219.<br />
79 Liebeschuetz, 1989, 168.<br />
80 McGuire, 1997, 84, esp. n47. Cf. Von Albrecht, 1966; Vessey, 1973; Ahl, Davis, Pomeroy, 1986, 2511<br />
who note that the differences between Silius‟ Hannibal and Caesar are almost as compelling as the<br />
similarities.<br />
24