SLC Thesis Template - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University ...
SLC Thesis Template - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University ...
SLC Thesis Template - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Polybius‟ stage analogy carries a subtext for Hannibal‟s next move: that Hannibal<br />
deliberately stages a dramatic exit through the pass guarded by Fabius‟ men instead of<br />
leaving by any one of the other possible exits. <strong>The</strong> representation of Fabius correctly<br />
guessing that Hannibal would leave by the same pass that he arrived and posting<br />
soldiers to guard the pass is unexplained (Hist. 3.92.10). Polybius‟ lack of information<br />
about other factors, such as deserters or spies informing Fabius or the encumbrances of<br />
booty restricting Hannibal‟s choice of exit, leave a more lasting impression that<br />
Hannibal‟s spectacular diversion of oxen running berserk with burning faggots tied to<br />
their horns becomes a calculated demonstration to show that one way or another<br />
Hannibal could outwit and upstage Fabius Maximus.<br />
Livy pays less credit to Hannibal‟s intelligence and the abilities of his scouts than<br />
does Polybius. Hannibal enters the ager Falernus in error when a guide mistakes his<br />
Latin pronunciation of Casinum for Casilinum (Livy, 22.13.6, also Plutarch, Fab. Max.<br />
6.1). <strong>The</strong> misunderstanding, considered by Frederiksen as „too picturesque to be true,‟ 321<br />
leads to a portrayal of Hannibal exhibiting barbaric cruelty through scourging and<br />
crucifying the unfortunate guide (Livy, 22.13.9).<br />
Livy alludes to the tradition for presenting Hannibal‟s intentions through a theatrical<br />
analogy but gives it less force than Polybius because it is voiced through the soon-to-be-<br />
discredited Minucius. As a frustrated member of Hannibal‟s audience, Minucius angrily<br />
complains about idly watching Hannibal‟s army devastate the countryside 322 as if<br />
watching a spectacle: „spectatum huc…ut ad rem fruendam oculis, sociorum caedes et<br />
incendia, venimus‟ (Livy, 22.14.4).<br />
As Livy does not compare the area to a stage with three exits, there is no subtext that<br />
Hannibal deliberately upstaged Fabius when he could have exited by another route.<br />
Livy‟s Fabius, like his Polybian counterpart, is, nonetheless, certain about which route<br />
Hannibal would take to leave the area and installs guards to block the way:<br />
321 Frederiksen, 1984, 238. von Ungern-Sternberg, 1975, ch 1, argues that Livy relocated the anecdote. Cf.<br />
Luce, 1976, 391 notes that von Ungern-Sternberg takes a „very dim view‟ of the Roman annalistic<br />
tradition.<br />
322 Hannibal is said to devastate all the farmlands except those which his informants told him belonged to<br />
the Fabii. Consequently Fabius has to convince everyone, especially his army, of his loyalty to Rome,<br />
while continuing to resist the urge to fight Hannibal (Livy, 22.23.4; Val. Max. 7.3 ext. 8; Plutarch, Fab.<br />
Max. 7.2; Dio Cassius, 14, 15, Zonaras 8, 26; Frontinus, Strat. 1.8.2; Pun. 7.260-267). This anecdote,<br />
while not directly related to the thesis topic, is further evidence for literary adaptation within<br />
historiographical texts as Walbank, I, 430 and Frederiksen, 1984, 238 read it as comparison between<br />
Fabius and Pericles. I would argue that in the Roman tradition it compares Fabius to Coriolanus (cf. Livy,<br />
2.39.6). <strong>The</strong> „historical‟ context of this story also differs between texts as Plutarch, Fabius, 6, associates it<br />
with Hannibal‟s departure from the Falernian plain whereas Livy places it later in his narrative.<br />
131