SLC Thesis Template - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University ...
SLC Thesis Template - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University ...
SLC Thesis Template - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Speeches are important signifiers in a text for many reasons quite apart from their<br />
content. <strong>The</strong>y are an integral part of Greek and Roman historiographical and epic<br />
traditions and serve a variety of purposes. <strong>The</strong> location of a speech within its physical<br />
and literary context, whether it is in direct or reported format, and in what sequence it is<br />
placed against speeches by other characters, all reflect the author‟s priorities. <strong>The</strong><br />
earliest known discussion on the subject of speeches is in Thucydides‟ first Book where<br />
Thucydides announced his decision to include speeches in his text insofar as he could<br />
recall them, or failing that, to provide a speech that best fitted the occasion (Thucydides,<br />
1.22).<br />
In terms of structural detail there are interesting similarities and differences between<br />
the use of speeches by Polybius, Livy, and Silius Italicus. All three texts present<br />
Hannibal giving a speech at, or near, the top of an Alpine pass, for example, but they<br />
differ from one another in content and in details of context, the reasons for which are<br />
discussed in the second chapter. Similarly, there are nuanced differences between their<br />
respective presentations of speeches shortly before the battle at Cannae, discussed in the<br />
fourth chapter, and prior to Zama, discussed in the sixth chapter. Some of these<br />
differences may be considered minor, such as a reversal of ordering, but, in the context<br />
of the hierarchical nature of ancient Roman society and ancient rhetorical theory, these<br />
sequences are important and revealing about the author‟s priorities, the contemporary<br />
reception of the text, and the representation of Hannibal.<br />
Whilst the extant speeches under discussion might just conceivably be faithful<br />
transcriptions 65 of an original oration, it is more likely that they are either the product of<br />
an author editing a predecessor‟s version, or entirely composed by the author to suit a<br />
given occasion and fulfil a particular characterisation. <strong>The</strong> frequency of speeches being<br />
„paired‟ either by content, or position, or a combination of both, in the texts argues<br />
against the content being a faithful transcription of an original speech. This<br />
interpretation is further supported by the fact that many of the speeches contain readily<br />
identifiable inter- and intra- textual connections; these connections are particularly<br />
noticeable for speeches within and between Livy and Silius Italicus‟ Punica, but it will<br />
be shown that they also apply to certain speeches in Polybius. As Walbank comments<br />
„the two harangues by Hannibal and Scipio prior to the Ticinus River (Hist. 3.63-4) are<br />
65 Luce, 1997, 129 notes Polybius‟ „concern with the truth‟ and that speeches should reflect what was said<br />
at the time (Hist. 2.56 cf. 29.12; 36.1).<br />
19