SLC Thesis Template - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University ...
SLC Thesis Template - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University ...
SLC Thesis Template - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Presently the wondrous treasure became the property of the<br />
Nasamonian king. Hannibal, ever savage of hand and proud in<br />
treacherous sword, gave libation to the valiant god, who hated him,<br />
steeped as he was in the blood of the Italian race, carrying dire<br />
conflagration to Romulean dwellings, even as he offered him viands<br />
and Lenaean bounty, grieving he accompanied that wicked army,<br />
above all when Hannibal with sacrilegious torch mangled the god‟s<br />
own towers, defiling the houses and temples of innocent Saguntum<br />
and filling her people with a noble frenzy.<br />
Shackleton Bailey, 2003, 287.<br />
Like Martial, Statius recounts a list of prestigious previous owners for the statuette. <strong>The</strong><br />
list not only includes Alexander and Hannibal but also Sulla which makes the Silvae one<br />
of the few texts to connect Hannibal and Sulla (Statius, Silv. 4.6.85-6; Martial, Ep.<br />
9.43.9). 159<br />
McNelis 160 argues that the current owner, Vindex, must be a personage of authority<br />
given this poetic alignment with Alexander, Hannibal and Sulla through ownership of a<br />
statue, yet Statius is explicit about the contrast between the statue‟s previous owners and<br />
the present one, Vindex. <strong>The</strong> statue no longer lives in a world of royal pomp, ceremony<br />
or warfare but resides instead with an owner who believes in old-fashioned values of<br />
fides and prefers singing to warfare (Silv. 4.6.92-109). Statius believes that Lysippus<br />
would approve of Vindex as the owner of his artwork (Silv. 4.6.108-9) and expresses<br />
admiration for Vindex‟s skill as a connoisseur of fine art and identifying the uninscribed<br />
bronze as the work of Lysippus:<br />
quis namque oculis certaverit usquam<br />
Vindicis artificum veteres agnoscere ductus<br />
et non inscriptis auctorem reddere signis?<br />
54<br />
Statius, Silv. 4.6.23-4<br />
For who would ever rival Vindex‟ eyes in recognising the hands of old<br />
masters and restoring its maker to an untitled statue?<br />
Shackleton Bailey, 2003, 283.<br />
158 Newlands, 2002, 73 reads Statius, Silv. 4.6 on the statuette as complementing Silv. 1.1 on the<br />
equestrian statue of Domitian in the forum; she notes that Silv. 4.6 is the longest poem in Silv. 4 as Statius<br />
cultivates the paradox of the length of poem against the diminutive size of the statuette and Hercules‟<br />
reputation for super-human size and strength. Bassett, 1966, 268 compares the poetic treatments of the<br />
statue between Martial and Statius.<br />
159 Spencer, 2002, 242, n.9 argues that Sulla is an appropriate addition because Alexander was a model for<br />
Roman generals who absorbed too much power for themselves. McNelis, 2008, 258 notes that the rhetoric<br />
is more important than the „truth,‟ arguing that the transmission of the statuette from Alexander to<br />
Hannibal to Sulla mirrors Roman cultural absorption of Greek art by conquest (the conquests of Syracuse<br />
and Tarentum in the Second Punic War brought the first inheritances of Greek Art to Rome).<br />
160 McNelis, 2008, 255. Cf. Rawlings, 2005, 155 notes that these „Domitianic poets evidently enjoyed<br />
exploring the interplay between Hannibal‟s aspirations and Hercules‟ supposed contempt for them.‟