SLC Thesis Template - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University ...
SLC Thesis Template - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University ...
SLC Thesis Template - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Plutarch refers. <strong>The</strong> comparison indicates that Nepos‟ biography of Hannibal, as it is<br />
currently published, does not match up with Plutarch‟s assessment of placing Nepos<br />
among authors who say that Marcellus and others inflicted sundry defeats on Hannibal<br />
in Italy. A modification to the editing of Nepos‟ Hannibal was proposed, as, although it<br />
is possible that Plutarch was referring to a different biography one should expect it to<br />
correspond to the Hannibal.<br />
<strong>The</strong> following section compared presentations of Hannibal‟s determination to<br />
continue the war and the extent of his involvement with planning the invasions of Italy<br />
in 207 and 205. <strong>The</strong>se are arguably linked to each author‟s depiction of Scipio in terms<br />
of whether or not Scipio drove Hasdrubal out of Spain and forced Hannibal‟s departure<br />
from Italy. As much as anything, it is argued that Hannibal‟s dogged persistence led to<br />
his reputation as Rome‟s most feared enemy, exemplified in Horace Epode, 16.8.<br />
Most texts present Zama as the climactic event to the war, particularly in terms of<br />
what the two protagonists thought they were fighting for; Polybius is anachronistic with<br />
the claim that the Romans were fighting for world domination (Hist. 15.9.2). His view is<br />
important, however, for presentations of Hannibal in the role of an eternal enemy, since,<br />
as far as Polybius was concerned, the Romans were the dominant power by the time that<br />
the Histories were published some forty years later.<br />
Whereas Polybius draws connections between Zama and Homeric epic, Silius<br />
Italicus links Zama with to the historic civil war battle in Africa, Thapsus (Pun. 3.261-<br />
264; 17.371-85). In this respect, Zama marks the „beginning of the end‟ for Silius with<br />
the rise of Scipio and, in due course, Caesar claiming divine heritage (Pun. 17.653-4). 452<br />
It is argued in this thesis that Silius Italicus‟ consistent depiction of Hannibal as a sworn<br />
enemy meant that the epic Hannibal did not seek peace through a meeting with Scipio<br />
beforehand. <strong>The</strong> notion of being an eternal enemy of Rome is placed in Hannibal‟s<br />
voice, and perhaps, as depicted, the idea originated from him, and that his enemies<br />
accepted him in that role.<br />
Silius Italicus‟ Hannibal in the aftermath of Zama is quite different from the figure in<br />
both Livy and Polybius. <strong>The</strong> final chapter argues that authors had a number of options<br />
for their depictions of Hannibal‟s reaction to Zama, and how those depictions relate to<br />
an overall presentation of Hannibal as a sworn enemy of Rome. For authors such as<br />
183 notes Hannibal‟s camp above Capua but Frederiksen, 1984, 227, 238, 241, consistently refers to<br />
defection; only once concedes the Capuans may have been unable to resist.<br />
452 Also Boyle, 1991, 303.<br />
223