SLC Thesis Template - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University ...
SLC Thesis Template - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University ...
SLC Thesis Template - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
claims that Hannibal had avenged their defeat off the Aegates Islands: Aegates ille et<br />
servilia foedera larga ultus caede dies (Pun. 11.527-8). Hanno still argues for peace but<br />
for a different reason to the one given in Livy‟s text, it is because Hanno fears the<br />
Roman determination after losing at Cannae: vos ego, vos metuo, Cannae (Pun. 11.574).<br />
Livy includes two pairs of speeches that include recollections of the First Punic War<br />
which he arranges in an AB-BA pattern spanning the third decad. Two are by Hannibal<br />
[B] and the other two are each by a Scipio [A]. <strong>The</strong> first pair are by Hannibal and Scipio<br />
(the father of Africanus) to their respective armies prior to battle at the Ticinus River<br />
and the second pair are recorded as a conversation between Hannibal and Scipio<br />
Africanus shortly before battle at Zama.<br />
Livy also places a pair of speeches in the Roman Senate that include references to the<br />
First Punic War. <strong>The</strong> first is by Fabius Maximus and the second, given in response, by<br />
Scipio (Africanus). Fabius Maximus opposes the assignment of Africa to the newly<br />
elected consul, Scipio, in a forceful direct speech that uses a series of si clauses to draw<br />
comparisons between Scipio and Lutatius, the First and the Second Punic Wars, as well<br />
as between Hamilcar and Hannibal (Livy, 28.41.3-42). Fabius Maximus upholds<br />
Regulus as an example of someone who had mixed fortunes on African soil (Livy,<br />
28.42.1). Livy summarises what he describes as Scipio‟s response: Scipio ita locutus<br />
fertur (Livy, 28.43.2-44). Scipio ignores the comparison with Lutatius but argues for the<br />
right not to be influenced by Regulus‟ fate any more than that of his uncle and father<br />
who died in Spain (Livy, 28.43.17-19). Thus both speakers refer to the earlier examples<br />
from the First Punic War although Scipio also alludes to the more recent events around<br />
his father and uncle.<br />
By contrast, the representation of this debate in the Punica is, in one respect, more<br />
plausible because both speakers, Fabius and Scipio, focus on the contemporary<br />
circumstances of the Second Punic War. <strong>The</strong> epic Fabius poses a series of perfectly<br />
legitimate militarily-focussed questions to Scipio about how Hannibal might react to<br />
Scipio‟s invasion of Africa (Pun. 16.604-643). In structural terms Scipio‟s reply might<br />
be said to allude to Livy‟s version of Fabius‟ speech because the epic Scipio draws a<br />
series of comparisons between himself as the man-of-action and Fabius the Delayer,<br />
each prefaced by si (Pun. 16.676-680).<br />
Shortly before battle at Zama, Polybius and Livy present a meeting taking place<br />
between Hannibal and Scipio which is discussed more fully in Chapter 6, but relevant<br />
here in terms of the references the speakers make to the First Punic War (there is no<br />
40