SLC Thesis Template - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University ...
SLC Thesis Template - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University ...
SLC Thesis Template - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
ark, not surrendering until they received permission from the Senate (Hist. 7.1.2). 331<br />
Livy‟s vignette about the Compsans, however, is noted for its parallels to the Capuans.<br />
<strong>The</strong> Compsans are divided and argue about how they should respond to Hannibal.<br />
Eventually, the pro-Roman contingent, the Mopsii, is out-voted and leave town before<br />
Hannibal arrives (Livy, 23.1.2). <strong>The</strong> pro-Hannibal contingent, led by a Statius Trebius,<br />
invited Hannibal to enter and surrender the town to him:<br />
Hannibal post Cannensem pugnam castraque capta ac direpta<br />
confestim ex Apulia in Samnium moverat, accitus in Hirpinos a Statio<br />
Trebio pollicente se Compsam traditurum.<br />
Livy, 23.1.1<br />
After the battle at Cannae and the capture and plunder of the camps,<br />
Hannibal moved out of Apulia into Samnium, having been invited to<br />
the land of the Hirpini by Statius Trebius, who promised that he would<br />
surrender Compsa to him.<br />
Adapted from Moore, 1951, 3.<br />
Livy assumes his audience is aware of the physical location of Compsa in the Aufidus<br />
valley to the west of Cannae, and that Hannibal, heading up the valley from Cannae,<br />
would reach Compsa whether or not he was invited. Under these circumstances the<br />
Compsan surrender to Hannibal is arguably more prudent than attempting to hold out<br />
against him, but, as with the Capuans, that is not the point: surrender should not be an<br />
option for an ally of Rome. 332<br />
It is moral comparison by contrast to Rome and individual Romans that underlies<br />
much of Livy‟s depiction of Capua and individual Capuans for this episode. <strong>The</strong> story<br />
of Capua generally and the details about certain individuals are adapted to illustrate how<br />
Roman moral values, such as the various forms of fides, are missing or distorted<br />
amongst Capuans. 333 Like the Compsans, Livy‟s Capuans argue over how they should<br />
respond to Hannibal. This is quite the opposite of what will be the Roman reaction when<br />
Rome faces the same crisis in 211 when the Romans are depicted working together as a<br />
331 Livy‟s annalistic format places the story of the Petelians after the winter in Capua, 23.19.1-2.<br />
332 Varro‟s list of requirements to the Capuan delegation commissioned to visit him not only illustrated<br />
just how severely the Roman resources were depleted but also clearly indicated that Varro had not<br />
surrendered (Livy, 23.5.2; Val. Max. 7.6.1a). This message was not taken seriously enough by the<br />
Capuans, described by Livy as proud and faithless: superbis atque infidelibus Livy, 23.5.1.<br />
333 Moore, 1989; Edwards, 1993 and Chaplin, 2000 (esp. Introduction) discuss various moral values<br />
upheld in parts of Livy‟s text but not in terms of comparing Capua against Rome. Moore focuses<br />
primarily on Livy‟s portrayal of Roman virtues but does not compare them against Capuan vices;<br />
Edwards and Chaplin focus their studies on Livy‟s depiction of individual Roman generals as moral<br />
examples.<br />
140