SLC Thesis Template - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University ...
SLC Thesis Template - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University ...
SLC Thesis Template - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Chapter 5: Invading Campania, 217 and 216<br />
<strong>The</strong> first section of this chapter compares the treatments of one of the most famous and<br />
more bizarre of the „Hannibal‟ stories: Hannibal‟s incursion into the ager Falernus<br />
which ended with his legendary night-time escape past Roman sentries when he<br />
distracted their attention with oxen that had burning faggots tied to their horns. While<br />
the basic core of the story remains the same across the texts, the variations in the<br />
circumstances suggest that many details, such as exactly „when‟ and „where‟ it took<br />
place quickly became uncertain, perhaps the effect of retelling a popular, highly<br />
dramatic tale.<br />
<strong>The</strong> representations of Hannibal vary from Polybius depicting him deliberately<br />
staging a dramatic exit to Livy representing him making a mistake over Latin<br />
pronunciation and tricking his way out of a trap. Silius Italicus will be shown to weave<br />
elements from both of these traditions into the Punica as well as presenting a more<br />
pragmatic „truth,‟ also hinted at by Livy, which may underlie the story of the oxen.<br />
<strong>The</strong> second section compares the treatments of Hannibal‟s takeover and occupation<br />
of Capua in 216, and the reputedly detrimental effects of Capuan wealth and luxury on<br />
Hannibal and his men. Primarily the texts present the ease with which Hannibal took<br />
control of Capua in moral terms which leads to some interesting disconnections as<br />
authors have to balance the claim and its implications against later representations of<br />
Hannibal. Indeed, the focus on Capuan moral degradation is so strong in the<br />
historiographic texts that the „historic‟ details of how, exactly, Hannibal took control of<br />
the town are a confused mix of the Capuans inviting Hannibal to their town (for<br />
different reasons); negotiating a treaty, and/or surrendering (too easily) with further<br />
differences over whether or not there was consensus amongst them to admit Hannibal.<br />
<strong>The</strong> comparisons indicate that the material is adapted to illustrate whichever canonical<br />
Roman moral an author considers to be most perverted, or missing at Capua or,<br />
conversely, which canonical sins the author wishes to promote in either, or both, of<br />
Hannibal and the Capuans. Once Hannibal enters the town, authors take the opportunity<br />
to display aspects of Hannibal‟s character through a selection of scenes that illustrate<br />
Hannibal‟s Punica fides: his greed, gluttony and tyranny.<br />
Where it might be expected that an author would represent Hannibal and his army<br />
becoming seduced and weakened by the effects of Capuan luxury, the texts are more<br />
128