07.09.2017 Views

David K.H. Begg, Gianluigi Vernasca-Economics-McGraw Hill Higher Education (2011)

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER 5 Consumer choice and demand decisions<br />

0 from bundle a to bundle b, the consumer increases her consumption of good X, from xa to xb, but she has to<br />

reduce the consumption of good Y from Ya to Yb· This shows the trade-off between the two goods implied by the<br />

budget constraint. Since the budget line is linear, we can find the slope of the budget line analytically in a simple<br />

way. Notice that both bundles (a and b) satisfy the budget constraint, therefore it must be true that:<br />

and<br />

M Px<br />

Ya = ---Xa<br />

py py<br />

M Px<br />

Yb =---xb<br />

py py<br />

By taking the difference between (4) and (3), we obtain:<br />

(3)<br />

(4)<br />

M M Px Px<br />

Yb -Ya = -----xb +-Xa<br />

PY PY PY Pr<br />

(5)<br />

Call y =Yb - Ya the change in the quantity of Y between bundle b and bundle a, and similarly for good X<br />

define = xb - xa. Then (5) can be written as:<br />

Or, written differently:<br />

that is, exactly the slope of the budget line.<br />

y = -Px <br />

Pr<br />

y Px<br />

-=--<br />

x py<br />

Utility maximization and choice<br />

The budget line shows affordable bundles given a consumer's market environment (her budget and the<br />

price of different goods). The indifference map shows her tastes. We put the two<br />

The chosen bundle will concepts together in order to see how the consumer chooses among different<br />

be the point at which an bundles. We assume that the consumer is rational, implying that she chooses the<br />

indifference curve just touches affordable bundle that maximizes her utility. She cannot afford points above the<br />

the budget line. The budget<br />

budget line and will never choose points below the budget line (it is then possible<br />

line is a tangent to the<br />

indifference curve at this point.<br />

to buy more of one good without sacrificing any of the other good). She will select<br />

a point on the budget line - her chosen bundle.<br />

To find which point on the budget line maximizes utility, we examine the consumer's tastes. Our glutton<br />

should pick a point with more meals and fewer films than the point our film buff selects. We first show how<br />

to use indifference curves to find the bundle the consumer chooses. Then we confirm that our model of<br />

consumer choice captures the different behaviour of the glutton and the film buff.<br />

Figure 5.7 shows the budget line AF for the student who had £50 to spend on films (£10 each) and meals<br />

(£5 each). The indifference curves 1/1 UI> U2U2 and U 3 U 3 are part of the indifference map describing her tastes.<br />

All points on U3 U3 are unattainable since it lies entirely above the budget line AF. The student would like<br />

this high level of utility but cannot afford it. Next, suppose she considers the attainable point B on the<br />

indifference curve 1/11/1• She prefers this to point A, which must lie on a lower indifference curve (since<br />

indifference curves cannot intersect, the indifference curve through A lies entirely below the indifference<br />

curve U1 U1). Similarly, F must lie on a lower indifference curve than E and she prefers E to F.<br />

100

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!