07.09.2017 Views

David K.H. Begg, Gianluigi Vernasca-Economics-McGraw Hill Higher Education (2011)

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER 27 Business cycles<br />

The multiplier-accelerator model explains business cycles by the dynamic interaction of consumption and<br />

investment demand. The insight of the model is that it takes accelerating output growth to increase<br />

investment. Once output growth stabilizes, so does investment. In the following period, investment must<br />

fall, since output growth has been reduced. The economy moves into a period of recession, but once the<br />

rate of output fall stops accelerating, investment starts to pick up again.<br />

This simple model is not the definitive model of a business cycle. If output keeps cycling, surely firms stop<br />

extrapolating past output growth to form assessments of future profits? Firms, like economists, recognize<br />

that there is a business cycle. The less investment decisions respond to the most recent change in past<br />

output, the less pronounced will be the cycle.<br />

The multiplier-accelerator model of cycles<br />

II<br />

Suppose I denotes current investment, L1 denotes investment in the previous period, Y denotes<br />

output and dY denotes (Y- Y_1 ), the increase in output between last period and the current<br />

period. Output Y is related to current investment I by the multiplier Y = 1/(1 - c), where c is the marginal<br />

propensity to consume. Investment depends on output growth, so I= a d Y. Hence,<br />

Hence<br />

I = a d Y = [al( 1 - c)] [I<br />

- I_ 1]<br />

I= -{ a/[1 - c - a]}l_1<br />

This equation is of the general form I= bL1• If b is a positive fraction, I is always smaller than the period<br />

before and gradually converges on zero. If b exceeds unity, I gets larger and larger for ever. Negative values of<br />

b imply I becomes negative every second period, either converging to zero or becoming ever larger. None of<br />

this generates things like business cycles.<br />

Cycles emerge however with small changes to these formulae. Table 27.1 offers one example. Here is another.<br />

Suppose the consumption function depends not on current income but on income the previous period<br />

so that C = A + c Y_1 and current investment depends on output growth in the previous period, so that I =<br />

a[Y_1 - Y_2]. Since Y = C +I in this simple economy,<br />

If the economy is in long-run equilibrium, output is constant, the final term is zero, and equilibrium output<br />

Y* is given by Y*= Al(I - c). Usingy to denote Y - Y*, the deviation of output from its long-run level, we can<br />

subtract Y* from both sides of equation ( 1) to yield<br />

y = cy_1 + a[y_1 - y_2] (2)<br />

Depending on the values of c and a, equation (2) can yield constant cycles, damped cycles that gradually get<br />

smaller and smaller, or explosive cycles that get larger and larger. When c = a, we simply get<br />

(y - Y-1 ) = -(y_. - Y- 2 )<br />

so that positive and negative growth of similar size alternate for ever.<br />

(1)<br />

Ceilings and floors<br />

The multiplier-accelerator model can generate cycles even without any physical limits on the extent of<br />

fluctuations. Cycles are even more likely when we recognize the limits imposed by supply and demand.<br />

Aggregate supply provides a ceiling in practice. Although it is possible temporarily to meet high aggregate<br />

demand by working overtime and running down stocks of finished goods, output cannot expand indefinitely.<br />

620

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!