07.09.2017 Views

David K.H. Begg, Gianluigi Vernasca-Economics-McGraw Hill Higher Education (2011)

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

29. 7 The economics of the euro<br />

The idea was correct but the sums were wrong. The original US calculations are relevant to a world in<br />

which state incomes are uncorrelated with each other. In practice, the correlation is quite high.<br />

Hence, when one state slumps and gets help from Washington, many other states are slumping and also<br />

getting help. But this increases US government debt and means every state has to pay higher future taxes.<br />

But an individual state could have done that on its own, without membership of the federal 'mutual<br />

insurance' club. It could have borrowed in the slump to boost its own fiscal spending, and paid it back later<br />

when times were better. Making allowance for this, US states are probably insured by nearer to 10 cents in<br />

the dollar than 40 cents.<br />

However, the Stability Pact may have prevented individual EMU countries behaving in this way, by<br />

restricting their ability to borrow in bad times. In fact, over time the Stability Pact was interpreted more<br />

flexibly, having greater regard for the effect of temporary cycles in temporarily reducing tax revenue.<br />

Even before the financial crash, the most powerful eurozone members, Germany and France, were not<br />

penalized for exceeding the 3 per cent ceiling. Once the crash took place, and the world followed the lead<br />

of the UK and US in opting for huge fiscal deficits to stave off even worse reduction in aggregate demand,<br />

budget deficits soared in the eurozone as elsewhere.<br />

By the start of 2010, the eurozone therefore faced a number of fiscal challenges. First, to what extent could<br />

the reputation for fiscal prudence be restored? Second, how could acute differences in the outcomes of<br />

different member states be resolved without having a common fiscal policy? Third, could the possible<br />

bankruptcy of individual member states be prevented? As in all questions of redistribution, the fortunate<br />

have to be willing to pay for the unfortunate. In part, the definition of a workable nation state is a grouping<br />

of citizens across whom the common bond is sufficiently large that the rich agree to be taxed (a bit) to pay<br />

for the poor. During 2010 German voters made it pretty clear they were not excited about paying for<br />

Greece or Portugal. The less fiscal support such countries obtain, the more they may be driven to restore<br />

their monetary autonomy by leaving the eurozone altogether.<br />

Irish deflation<br />

II<br />

Irish unions agree to link pay rises to efficiency, reported John Murray Brown in the Financial<br />

Times (30 March 2010), following a deal between the government and public sector trade<br />

unions. In exchange for the avoidance of compulsory redundancies, unions agreed to flexible work practices<br />

and possible pay cuts as well.<br />

The objective of the policy was two-fold. The direct effect was to tighten fiscal policy by shrinking public<br />

spending. During 2008-10 Irish fiscal policy was tightened by 6 per cent of GDP. Ireland aims to have reduced<br />

its budget deficit from 12 per cent in 2008 back to the Stability Pact target of 3 per cent of GDP by 2014.<br />

The second effect of the policy is to reduce the price level in Ireland. If nominal wages are reduced, and prices<br />

then fall, Ireland's competitiveness will increase even within the eurozone. Domestic wage and price reduction<br />

is a substitute for nominal exchange rate depreciation.<br />

In the December 2009 budget, public sector workers took pay cuts from 5 per cent for people earning below<br />

€30 000 to 10 per cent for those on higher incomes. This was on top of a pension levy in February 2009 that<br />

reduced take-home pay by 5 per cent.<br />

Suppose Irish prices and wages each fall by 10 per cent. How much poorer have Irish people become? The answer<br />

depends on the openness of the Irish economy. If imports were only 10 per cent of the size of GDP, real wages<br />

would be reduced only a little since most goods are produced domestically and their prices have fallen by the<br />

same percentage as nominal wages. Conversely, if imports are 90 per cent of the size of GDP, then the nominal<br />

wage cut is matched by a price cut on only the 10 per cent of goods produced and consumed in Ireland, and<br />

Q<br />

677

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!