07.09.2017 Views

David K.H. Begg, Gianluigi Vernasca-Economics-McGraw Hill Higher Education (2011)

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

12.6 Efficient asset markets<br />

II<br />

Behavioural<br />

Behavioural finance<br />

finance is the study of the influence of psychology on the behaviour of financial<br />

practitioners and the subsequent effect on markets.<br />

'People make barmy decisions about the future. The evidence is all around, from their investments in<br />

the stock.markets to the way their run their businesses. In fact, people are consistently bad at dealing<br />

with uncertainty, underestimating some kinds of risk and overestimating others.<br />

Daniel Kahneman, now a professor at Princeton, noticed as a young research psychologist in the 1960s<br />

that the logic of decision science was hard for people to accept. [ . .. ] In the past decade the fields of<br />

behavioural finance and behavioural economics have blossomed, and in 2002 Mr Kahneman shared<br />

a Nobel prize in economics for his work:<br />

(The Economist, 22 January 2004)<br />

So far, the economics that we have examined assumes that people are completely rational and that the cost of<br />

acquiring information is either free or can be modelled in simple ways. This leads to an incredibly powerful<br />

set of economic tools that help us understand many complicated situations. But it is not the whole story. Here<br />

is a glimpse of how we could complicate our analysis.<br />

Suppose there is a fixed cost of either acquiring information or of taking the time to make a decision. This<br />

leads to 'bounded rationality: It is no longer optimal to examine every possible decision in great detail - you<br />

would incur too many fixed costs - so instead you incur costs once, have a good think, and then come up with<br />

a simple decision rule that you implement automatically until it no longer fits the facts, at which point you<br />

incur some more thinking costs and try to improve your rule. Simple rules may explain why people extrapolate<br />

the recent past rather than conduct extensive research all the time.<br />

Such behavioural rules are a large part of the concern of psychologists, who have conducted a lot of empirical<br />

research on how accurate these rules are. Often, people err in systematic ways, over time because they have<br />

not updated their old rules, and across people because they are using similar short cuts that are making the<br />

same mistake. For example, most people's optimism rises the longer the time horizon. Forty per cent of<br />

Americans think they will some day be in the top 1 per cent of income earners! Recently, economists have<br />

applied these ideas to financial markets, in the search for systematic mistakes in asset pricing.<br />

One reason that economists have been sceptical about applications that make use of departures from full<br />

rationality is that there is only one way to be rational but a million ways in which to be irrational. Anyone can<br />

explain a particular event by invoking a particular kind of irrationality - it then takes a lot of data to establish<br />

whether there is anything systematic in this irrationality or whether it was just a coincidence invoked by<br />

someone trying to be wise after the event.<br />

Thus one interpretation of why some investors do better than others is pure chance. This story could even<br />

explain why some investors have above-average returns for several years in a row. Even with a fair coin there<br />

is roughly one chance in a thousand of tossing ten consecutive heads. Even if there is no systematic way to<br />

beat the market, there are thousands of investors, and someone is going to have a lucky streak for ten years.<br />

But there is also a more subtle interpretation. When a piece of new information first becomes available,<br />

someone has to decide how share prices should be adjusted. The price does not change by magic. And there<br />

is an incentive to be quick off the mark. The first person to get the information, or to calculate correctly<br />

where the market will soon be setting the price, may be able to buy a share just before everyone else catches<br />

on and the share's price rises.<br />

The non-specialist investor cannot use past information to make above-average profits. But specialist<br />

investors, by reacting very quickly, can make capital gains or avoid capital losses within the first few hours<br />

293

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!