07.09.2017 Views

David K.H. Begg, Gianluigi Vernasca-Economics-McGraw Hill Higher Education (2011)

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER 8 Perfect competition and pure monopoly<br />

and drive up the market price, the consequent rise in revenues and profits would simply attract new firms<br />

into the industry, thereby increasing total supply again and driving the price back down.<br />

Conversely, as we shall shortly see, when firms in a competitive industry are losing money, some firms will<br />

close down and, by reducing the number of firms remaining in the industry, reduce the total supply and<br />

drive the price up, thereby allowing the remaining firms to survive.<br />

To sum up, each firm in a competitive industry faces a horizontal demand curve at the going market price.<br />

To be a plausible description of the demand conditions facing a firm, the industry must have: ( 1) many<br />

firms, each trivial relative to the industry; (2) a homogeneous product, so that buyers would switch between<br />

firms if their prices differed; (3) perfect customer information about product quality, so that buyers know<br />

that the products of different firms really are the same; and ( 4) free entry and exit, to remove any incentive<br />

for existing firms to collude.<br />

Why do we need to study perfectly competitive<br />

markets?<br />

II<br />

A perfectly competitive market is characterized by many firms producing an identical product and so each<br />

firm is a price-taker, firms have freedom of entry and exit, and buyers are perfectly informed about the<br />

product sold in the market. All those assumptions rarely hold together in a given market, and therefore we<br />

rarely see a perfectly competitive market in reality.<br />

Why do we need to study something that may not exist in the real world?<br />

The answer is that we need to study perfectly competitive markets, for two main reasons. First, a perfectly<br />

competitive market may be considered a good approximation for many markets. For example, markets such<br />

as those for agricultural products or houses, the stock market and so on, can be reasonably well described by<br />

using the theory we are going to build in this chapter (together with the one built in Chapter 3).<br />

Second, a perfectly competitive market can be seen as a benchmark, an almost ideal situation, that we can use<br />

for comparison with other, possibly more realistic, market structures (like the monopoly that we are going to<br />

discuss later in this chapter, and the ones we are going to analyse in Chapter 9). The reason is that a perfectly<br />

competitive market has some desirable properties in terms of efficiency of the market outcome, as we will<br />

discuss later in this chapter and in Chapter 13 on welfare economics.<br />

A perfectly competitive firm's supply decision<br />

Chapter 7 developed a general theory of supply. The firm uses the marginal condition (MC = MR) to find<br />

the best positive output. Then it uses the average condition to check whether the price for which this<br />

output is sold covers average cost.<br />

This general theory must hold for the special case of perfectly competitive firms. The special feature of<br />

perfect competition is the relationship between marginal revenue and price. A competitive firm faces a<br />

horizontal demand curve. Making and selling extra output does not bid down the price for which existing<br />

output is sold. The extra revenue from selling an extra unit is simply the price received. A perfectly<br />

competitive firm's marginal revenue is its output price:<br />

MR =P (1)<br />

172

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!