mb

Instead, it is less correct to translate “be-tsalmé-nu” with “katà eikòna”
because this Hebrew code does not have the meaning of “as resemblance” but
the precise meaning of “with the image” or better: “with - through - that
material which contains the image“.
Accordingly, we would have not been created “in the image” of the Elohìm,
but “with that material something that contains the image” of the Elohìm.
Quite a key difference!
Here is the concrete and new evidence, always left out by traditional religious
interpretations because it is non-compatible with the doctrine they want to
spread and support.
Note also that Genesis says all creatures «were made according to their
species», but this is not said referring to man: after the “divine” intervention,
his species is different from his own original one!
But there's more. As we continue, let's always keep in mind the Sumerians'
stories, which assert that the material implanted into men was removed from
ANUNNAKI' purified blood.
Actually, the term tselèm denotes not only a concrete and material quid but
also it contains, in the original meaning of the Semitic root, the concept of “cut
off from...”.
Under the term “tselèm” the Dictionary of Biblical Hebrew and
Aramaic 13 “brown-Driver- Briggs Hebrew and English Lexicon” contains the
following definitions: «something cut off». In fact, the verbal root rWb is
translated as “cut off”.
And what is it which contains the image of someone who can be “cut off,
cut out, or extracted”? There is only one possible answer: DNA!
If this is so, then it is easy to understand why the writer of Genesis has felt the
need to repeat twice that we have been made “with his tselèm...the Elohìm's
tselèm”... He wanted to be sure the reader understood the concreteness of the
event.
This was the extraordinary nature of the act carried out by The Elohìm (the
lords who came from above): To introduce something “really theirs” into
46