11/00713/F - Borough Council of King's Lynn & West Norfolk
11/00713/F - Borough Council of King's Lynn & West Norfolk
11/00713/F - Borough Council of King's Lynn & West Norfolk
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
� At long last a realistic proposal for London House after years <strong>of</strong> neglect. The sooner<br />
the property is restored the better. It has been a dangerous eyesore in the centre <strong>of</strong><br />
the village for far too long.<br />
� There is delight to learn that something is finally being done about London House. It<br />
has been an eyesore for nearly 20 years and is a cause for concern in the village.<br />
� London House is unsightly and increasingly, as is deteriorates, a potential danger to<br />
pedestrians and traffic. The writer sees no possible objection to this commendable<br />
enterprise and wholeheartedly supports the application. The writer also sees no<br />
objection either to the proposed new dwelling behind London House as it will not be<br />
visible from the A148 and hardly visible from the properties in Bagthorpe Road<br />
whence there might be a glimpse <strong>of</strong> the top <strong>of</strong> a ro<strong>of</strong> – and a view over ro<strong>of</strong>tops can<br />
be quite attractive.<br />
One further letter states that it is difficult to comment on the application as it covers two quite<br />
distinct and separate projects. The writer supports the proposal to do something with London<br />
House as it would be a positive asset to the village, but considers that the old shop should<br />
be removed as it was an obviously opportunistic add-on that will never look quite in place<br />
even with the proposed new windows. It is as other old premises, eg the butcher’s shop,<br />
which were never meant or built to become lasting legacies. The extra space would improve<br />
the vision splay for traffic/people using the existing access.<br />
The writer is in favour <strong>of</strong> using a CPO to secure the building but comments on the process if<br />
it excludes all others and suggests a variant <strong>of</strong> a sealed bid process.<br />
The proposed new dwelling to the north <strong>of</strong> Limes House is supported.<br />
NATIONAL GUIDANCE<br />
PPS5 – Planning for the Historic Environment (2010) provides advice on development in<br />
Conservation Areas and that involving Listed Buildings.<br />
EAST OF ENGLAND PLAN<br />
Policy ENV6: The Historic Environment - Local planning authorities should identify, protect,<br />
conserve and, where appropriate, enhance the historic environment <strong>of</strong> the region, its<br />
archaeology, historic buildings, places and landscapes, including historic parks and gardens<br />
and those features and sites (and their settings) especially significant in the East <strong>of</strong> England.<br />
LDF CORE STRATEGY POLICIES<br />
CS12 - Environmental Assets<br />
PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS<br />
The primary considerations in the determination <strong>of</strong> this application are the impact <strong>of</strong> the<br />
proposals on the two buildings in question. However, the proposal will also have some affect<br />
on the setting <strong>of</strong> the adjacent buildings Lime House, St Marys Church, (Grade ll*) and The<br />
Crown PH (Grade ll) opposite, and the character <strong>of</strong> the wider conservation area. All are<br />
designated heritage assets as defined by PPS5: Planning for the Historic Environment.<br />
<strong>11</strong>/00951/LB Development Control Board<br />
25 July 20<strong>11</strong><br />
94