11/00713/F - Borough Council of King's Lynn & West Norfolk
11/00713/F - Borough Council of King's Lynn & West Norfolk
11/00713/F - Borough Council of King's Lynn & West Norfolk
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
In general the Construction and Decommissioning Environmental Management Plan<br />
identifies the sources <strong>of</strong> disamenity and potential controls. More detail is required on the<br />
specifics and the implementation <strong>of</strong> the controls. I request that is conditioned so that the<br />
information is provided up front and that everything is agreed by the local planning authority.<br />
BCKLWN Waste & Recycling Manager: The proposal fails to meet national policy and<br />
regulation through the failure to follow the waste hierarchy which requires that waste is<br />
reduced, reused or recycled prior to recovery. The size <strong>of</strong> the incinerator fails to meet<br />
sustainability criteria due to its location on the extreme west <strong>of</strong> the County and therefore<br />
does not support the proximity principle <strong>of</strong> dealing with waste where it arises. The scale and<br />
the location <strong>of</strong> the facility will also draw in waste from across the borders <strong>of</strong> the county and<br />
squeeze out recycling and other more sustainable forms <strong>of</strong> waste treatment in neighbouring<br />
counties who plan to deal with their own waste. The supporting documentation is lacking in<br />
many respects and <strong>of</strong> poor quality and significant additional work is required by the applicant<br />
to prove statements made in support <strong>of</strong> this proposal.<br />
There is evidence that the criteria for need for the incinerator are not met in terms <strong>of</strong><br />
Municipal Solid Waste because <strong>of</strong> falling waste levels, increased recycling opportunities and<br />
recycling <strong>of</strong> food waste as a real opportunity for sustainable management <strong>of</strong> wastes.<br />
BCKLWN Regeneration & Economic Development Manager: The section on Socio-<br />
Economic Effects (page 25) <strong>of</strong> the Non-technical summary (NTS) refers to socio-economic<br />
effects and identifies job creation (40 permanent operational and 200-300 construction jobs<br />
over 32 months) as the main positive externality <strong>of</strong> the proposed development, although<br />
paragraph 133 <strong>of</strong> the NTS (page 26) states that the development will bring a slight beneficial<br />
effect as it is difficult to demonstrate what percentage <strong>of</strong> those jobs will be awarded to the<br />
local workforce.<br />
The King’s <strong>Lynn</strong> and <strong>West</strong> <strong>Norfolk</strong> Economic Strategy sets out the Objectives and Priorities<br />
for delivering Sustainable Community Strategy vision <strong>of</strong> creating a thriving and growing<br />
economy. The strategy particularly seeks to attract new investment and encourage<br />
reinvestment by existing businesses whilst raising the qualifications and skills <strong>of</strong> the local<br />
workforce.<br />
The fact that the Power and Recycling Centre will create 40 new permanent jobs, albeit the<br />
skill levels <strong>of</strong> these jobs are not known, is to be acknowledged as is the additional<br />
expenditure in the local economy that should occur during the construction stage.<br />
However the main employment estates in King’s <strong>Lynn</strong>, including the two major employment<br />
development areas, are close to the application site and given the negative perceptions<br />
associated with the proposed development there is concern that this development could<br />
discourage investment decisions by both existing businesses and new business<br />
investments. In particular, businesses operating in the food industry, which is an important<br />
part <strong>of</strong> the local economy, may be deterred from investing in operations located in close<br />
proximity <strong>of</strong> the application site.<br />
Although difficult to quantify at the moment because <strong>of</strong> lack <strong>of</strong> evidence supplied with the<br />
application, the loss <strong>of</strong> potential employment resulting from the negative perceptions<br />
associated with the proposed development could be far greater than the small employment<br />
benefits provided by it.<br />
<strong>11</strong>/01064/CM Development Control Board<br />
25 July 20<strong>11</strong><br />
14