11/00713/F - Borough Council of King's Lynn & West Norfolk

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Recommend conditions relating to tree protection, tree works, tree retention and provision and implementation of a landscaping scheme. REPRESENTATIONS Two letters of representation have been received opposing the application on grounds the development would result in a loss of privacy, exacerbate the parking problems on Sandy Lane caused by the nearby care home, devalue property prices and the building work would create disruption and distress. NATIONAL GUIDANCE PPS1 - “Delivering Sustainable Development” (2005) sets out overarching policies on the delivery of sustainable development through the operation of the planning system and contains advice on design considerations. PPS3 – Housing (2010) sets out the national planning policy framework for delivering the Government’s housing objectives. EAST OF ENGLAND PLAN Policy SS1: Achieving Sustainable Development - The strategy seeks to bring about sustainable development by applying the guiding principles of the UK Sustainable Development Strategy 2005, the elements contributing to the creation of sustainable communities described in Sustainable Communities: Homes for All: Policy ENV7: Quality in the Built Environment - Local Development Documents should require new development to be of high quality which complements the distinctive character and best qualities of the local area and promotes urban renaissance and regeneration. PLANNING POLICIES The King’s Lynn and West Norfolk Local Plan (1998) contains the following saved policies that are relevant to the proposal: 4/21 - indicates that in built-up areas of towns or villages identified on the Proposals Map as Built Environment Type C or D development will be permitted where it is in character with the locality. LDF CORE STRATEGY POLICIES CS08 - Sustainable Development CS09 - Housing Distribution OTHER GUIDANCE Parish Plans – South Wootton Design Statement 11/00812/O Development Control Board 25 July 2011 154
PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS Principle of development The site lies within the built environment as defined on the Local Plan inset maps where there is a presumption in favour of new residential development as set out in the saved policies. Additionally the Core Strategy seeks to locate new housing development within King’s Lynn where a significant level of services are offered. The principle of the scheme is therefore supported. Although in outline form the siting of the properties inline with the dwellings opposite and to either side along with retaining sufficient space between buildings ensures the development respects the form along Sandy Lane. This level of development (2 detached dwellings) is only achievable due to the above average size of the garden of the dwelling at 122 Grimston Road. Whilst the recent changes to PPS3 classify the site as Greenfield land this does not undermine the acceptability of the proposal which respects the form and character of the area. Highway safety Norfolk County Council Highways Authority note the central point of access is acceptable and recommend conditions retaining the access arrangements, prevention of surface water drainage discharging onto the highway carriageway, prevention of any obstacles within the first 5m of the access into the site and provision of visibility splays. These conditions are considered reasonable and necessary in the interests of highway safety. Neighbour amenity Given the orientation of the properties fronting Sandy Lane and siting inline with and distance from the dwellings to either side along with those to the rear the proposal will not adversely impact on neighbour amenity. Both neighbouring properties opposite the site on the eastern side of Sandy Lane oppose the scheme on grounds of loss of privacy. These properties are 18m, at their closest point, from the proposed dwellings and only their front gardens will be overlooked. The development is therefore not considered to result in a material loss of privacy. Trees and Landscape The Borough Council Arboriculture Officer notes there will be significant loss of tree and vegetation cover; however the trees to be removed do not merit further protection. A further three trees, which are proposed to be retained, are likely to come under post development pressure for removal as they will obscure natural sunlight from the southern side of one property for most of the day. Additionally the submitted tree protection plan does not make adequate provision for the protection of a further tree. In order to adequately address the impact of the trees to be removed, those likely to be removed in the future and prevent any further loss of trees mitigation in the form of an appropriate landscaping scheme and ground protection measures is necessary. As outline consent is sought with ‘landscaping’ reserved this can be addressed as part of the reserved matters application. 11/00812/O Development Control Board 25 July 2011 155
Page 1 and 2:
DEVELOPMENT CONTROL BOARD AGENDA Mo
Page 3 and 4:
King’s Court, Chapel Street, King
Page 5 and 6:
11 PLANNING ENFORCEMENT - LAND AT 8
Page 7 and 8:
Item No. Application No. Location a
Page 9 and 10:
11/01064/CM Land at The Willows Bus
Page 11 and 12:
THE APPLICATION The site The site i
Page 13 and 14:
SUPPORTING CASE The following is ta
Page 15 and 16:
PLANNING HISTORY Willows Business P
Page 17 and 18:
� Combined emissions from other p
Page 19 and 20:
BCKLWN Environmental Health - Commu
Page 21 and 22:
Within 28 days from the receipt of
Page 23 and 24:
REPRESENTATIONS No separate consult
Page 25 and 26:
SAVED POLICIES OF THE NORFOLK WASTE
Page 27 and 28:
PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS The applica
Page 29 and 30:
For reasons referred to above and a
Page 31 and 32:
Involvement of the County Council i
Page 33 and 34:
The table below shows the scoring f
Page 35 and 36:
Energy Utilisation There does appea
Page 37 and 38:
The highest scoring site, if the sc
Page 39 and 40:
It will be down to Norfolk County C
Page 41 and 42:
However, the assessment concentrate
Page 43 and 44:
5) Reason The information presented
Page 45 and 46:
10/01419/FM Barwick Hall Farm Barwi
Page 47 and 48:
Recommendation REFUSE THE APPLICATI
Page 49 and 50:
hardstanding areas at the turbine l
Page 51 and 52:
esidents had there windows open- th
Page 53 and 54:
Norfolk Wildlife Trust: OBJECT Avoi
Page 55 and 56:
Environmental Health & Housing - En
Page 57 and 58:
NATIONAL GUIDANCE PPS1 - “Deliver
Page 59 and 60:
POLICY CONTEXT PPS22 ‘Renewable E
Page 61 and 62:
ased on 3-bladed turbines with a to
Page 63 and 64:
� The typical height of wind turb
Page 65 and 66:
Conservation (Natural Habitats &c)
Page 67 and 68:
In this case, the proposal is not d
Page 69 and 70:
With regard to Bloodgate Hill Fort,
Page 71 and 72:
It has been recognised by the Plann
Page 73 and 74:
the vast majority of the land conta
Page 75 and 76:
Planning Authorities should ensure
Page 77 and 78:
Parish: Denver AGENDA ITEM NO: 8/3(
Page 79 and 80:
� Members should visit the site b
Page 81 and 82:
Trees and Landscape The proposed ex
Page 83 and 84:
11/00950/F Lime House The Green Eas
Page 85 and 86:
end of the property include an arch
Page 87 and 88:
PLANNING HISTORY 11/00951/LB LISTED
Page 89 and 90:
Impact upon Listed Buildings and Co
Page 91 and 92:
designed in such a way as to minimi
Page 93 and 94:
(iii) an appraisal of remedial opti
Page 95 and 96:
12 Condition There are some hard su
Page 97 and 98:
11/00951/LB Lime House The Green Ea
Page 99 and 100:
an off-set carriage arch with board
Page 101 and 102:
goes with the change of use from sh
Page 103 and 104:
The PPS5 defines conservation as th
Page 105 and 106:
Proposed Typical Carts Shed Plans _
Page 107 and 108:
11/00302/F Heacham Manor Hotel Huns
Page 109 and 110:
such units in new buildings laid ou
Page 111 and 112: PPS4: Planning for Sustainable Econ
Page 113 and 114: � To avoid occupation by permanen
Page 115 and 116: 1 Reason To comply with Section 91
Page 117 and 118: 14 Condition All hard and soft land
Page 119 and 120: 24 Condition The bars and restauran
Page 121 and 122: Parish: Hockwold cum Wilton AGENDA
Page 123 and 124: The comparison between siting arran
Page 125 and 126: Given the extant 2003 approval, the
Page 127 and 128: RECOMMENDATION: APPROVE subject to
Page 129 and 130: Parish: King's Lynn AGENDA ITEM NO:
Page 131 and 132: Environment Agency: No objection -
Page 133 and 134: Particular concern had been raised
Page 135 and 136: Generally speaking residents of HMO
Page 137 and 138: RECOMMENDATION: APPROVE subject to
Page 139 and 140: Parish: Ringstead AGENDA ITEM NO: 8
Page 141 and 142: e outside the current ‘built’ e
Page 143 and 144: detached, two storey dwelling with
Page 145 and 146: 3 Condition Prior to the commenceme
Page 147 and 148: 11/00881/F The Old Smithy Church La
Page 149 and 150: Previously planning permission was
Page 151 and 152: REPRESENTATIONS No third party comm
Page 153 and 154: The proposed extension can be achie
Page 155 and 156: The proposed development is conside
Page 157 and 158: 10 Reason To ensure that risks from
Page 159 and 160: 11/00812/O The Beeches 122 Grimston
Page 161: SUPPORTING CASE The application is
Page 165 and 166: 4 Reason To ensure satisfactory lan
Page 167 and 168: Parish: Upwell AGENDA ITEM NO: 8/3(
Page 169 and 170: Environment Agency: No Comment Inte
Page 171 and 172: The applicants’ agent addresses t
Page 173 and 174: The Sale Full details of the sale p
Page 175 and 176: AGENDA ITEM: 9 167 DEVELOPMENT CONT
Page 177 and 178: 169 Brancaster 11/00514/F Mr S Glyn
Page 179 and 180: 171 Dersingham 11/00744/O Mrs Angel
Page 181 and 182: 173 Hilgay 11/00612/F Mr & Mrs Gilb
Page 183 and 184: 175 King's Lynn 11/00747/CU College
Page 185 and 186: 177 Middleton 27.05.2011 24.06.2011
Page 187 and 188: 179 Snettisham 11/00539/F Mr & Mrs
Page 189 and 190: 181 Thornham 11/00455/NMA_1 Mr A Mo
Page 191 and 192: 183 West Rudham 11/00741/F Client o
Page 193 and 194: De minimis 2 Delegated Authority -
Page 195 and 196: 187 Installation of upvc windows in
Page 197 and 198: 189 Unauthorised change of use of l
Page 199 and 200: 191 Pending Consideration Alleged u
Page 203 and 204: 195 DC Application Submitted allege
Page 205 and 206: 197 Pending Consideration Unauthori
Page 207 and 208: 199 Pending Consideration Alleged r
Page 211 and 212: 203 Pending Consideration School Ho
Page 213 and 214:
205 Pending Consideration One Acre
Page 215 and 216:
207 Pending Consideration alleged b
Page 217 and 218:
209 Alleged breach of planning perm
Page 219 and 220:
211 Pending Consideration KC 2000 L
Page 221 and 222:
213 Pending Consideration alleged u
Page 223 and 224:
215 Pending Consideration alleged b
Page 225 and 226:
217 5 Magdalen Road Tilney St Lawre
Page 227 and 228:
219 alleged breach of conditions re
Page 229 and 230:
221 DC Application Submitted allege
Page 231 and 232:
223 Pending Consideration Alleged u
Page 233 and 234:
225 Pending Consideration Condition
Page 235 and 236:
227 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL BOARD AGEND
Page 237 and 238:
4.0 PLANNING HISTORY 10/00200/F - S
Page 239 and 240:
231 for Gypsy & Travellers. The par
Page 241 and 242:
maximum fine on summary conviction
Page 243 and 244:
12.5 It is also of note that direct
Page 245 and 246:
237
Page 247 and 248:
239
show all

11/00713/F - Borough Council of King's Lynn & West Norfolk

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?