07.01.2013 Views

11/00713/F - Borough Council of King's Lynn & West Norfolk

11/00713/F - Borough Council of King's Lynn & West Norfolk

11/00713/F - Borough Council of King's Lynn & West Norfolk

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

With regard to Bloodgate Hill Fort, which is a Schedule Ancient Monument, it is noted by EH<br />

that it is a designated asset and through meeting the scheduling criteria it is recognised as<br />

being <strong>of</strong> national importance. The Iron Age works also survive to a reasonable height. In<br />

terms <strong>of</strong> the Monument at Risk Register, its status has been reduced to low because <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Norfolk</strong> Archaeological Trust's guardianship and the management is positive and beneficial<br />

to the archaeology. There are very few sites <strong>of</strong> this nature in the East <strong>of</strong> England, and it is<br />

one <strong>of</strong> only seven Iron Age ring works or forts in <strong>Norfolk</strong>. East Anglia does not have the<br />

same type or scale <strong>of</strong> monument as those in the south and west <strong>of</strong> the country, which fit the<br />

traditional model <strong>of</strong> Maiden Castle or Caer Caradoc. This example should therefore, be<br />

recognised for its distinctness and regional rarity, and could be seen to be as important as<br />

the larger and more famous monuments elsewhere in the south and west. It is further added<br />

that the undeveloped rural nature <strong>of</strong> the landscape around the hill fort should be considered<br />

as part <strong>of</strong> its setting. The views from the monument, including the sweeping vista from the<br />

north-west through to the south-west are an integral part <strong>of</strong> the setting. EH have therefore<br />

objected to the application.<br />

<strong>Norfolk</strong> Archaeological Trust (who own the site) has objected on the grounds <strong>of</strong> the adverse<br />

impact <strong>of</strong> the development upon the Iron Age Fort at South Creake; this is discussed in more<br />

depth above.<br />

There are three Registered Parks/Gardens in the wider area: Holkham Park (Grade I),<br />

Houghton Park (Grade I) and Raynham Park (Grade II). It has been concluded by English<br />

Heritage that the development would not affect either Holkham Park or Raynham Park.<br />

However, there remain concerns regarding Houghton Park. Despite the new assessment <strong>of</strong><br />

the historical development <strong>of</strong> the Park and the identification <strong>of</strong> principal axis and boundary<br />

woodland, the computer modelled ZTV illustrates visual impact upon part <strong>of</strong> the northern<br />

park and water tower, which falls within the grade I registered landscape. In addition, this<br />

drawing illustrates significant impact upon the setting <strong>of</strong> the park by direct visual impact upon<br />

land to the north in and around Bircham Common. Consideration <strong>of</strong> the text, images and<br />

drawings provided by the applicant also suggests to English Heritage that the level <strong>of</strong> impact<br />

upon the registered park and the setting <strong>of</strong> specific listed buildings within it could increase.<br />

Based upon the present evidence available, English Heritage concludes that these large<br />

structures with moving blades will visually intrude into the wider setting <strong>of</strong> the registered park<br />

and listed buildings in a manner harmful to their significance and visitors experience <strong>of</strong> them.<br />

RESIDENTIAL AMENITY AND NOISE<br />

Noise<br />

The operational noise from the proposed wind farm has been assessed in accordance with<br />

the methodology set out in the 1996 DTI Report ETSU-R-97 'The Assessment and Rating <strong>of</strong><br />

Noise from Wind Farms'. This document provides the basis for assessing the operational<br />

noise impact <strong>of</strong> a wind farm, as recommended by PPS22: Renewable Energy (2004).<br />

The ES concludes that the wind farm would comply with relevant guidance on wind farm<br />

noise and the impact on the amenity <strong>of</strong> all nearby properties would be regarded as<br />

acceptable. The <strong>Council</strong>'s Community Safety and Neighbourhood Nuisance (CSNN) Team<br />

have negotiated with the developer since the submission <strong>of</strong> the application acceptable levels<br />

taking into account the rural nature <strong>of</strong> the site and low background levels.<br />

10/01419/FM Development Control Board<br />

25 July 20<strong>11</strong><br />

61

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!