11/00713/F - Borough Council of King's Lynn & West Norfolk

More documents

Recommendations

Info

SUPPORTING CASE The following is taken from the applicant’s Design and Access Statement: “In spring 2010 the Borough Council approached the owners of the Lime House and asked them to consider purchasing and restoring London House, in a back-to-back agreement, should the local council buy London House using a compulsory purchase order (CPO). Following many discussions and consultation with other interested parties, the deal was agreed in principle. From an early date it was clear that the restoration of London House was not economically viable as a stand-alone project; for this reason the idea of recouping the loss by gaining access to the rear of the Lime House, separating the annex from Lime House and developing it was conceived. The benefits arising for the borough council, the parishioners of East Rudham, Highways and the owners of Lime House from the accomplishment of this proposal are: � The restoration to listed building standard of London House, which is currently a high priority on the Listed Buildings at risk list, and which the BC cannot afford to restore, at minimal cost to the local council. � The resolution of a long standing dispute between the residents of East Rudham with the support of their Parish Council concerning the failure of the Borough Council to meet its statutory requirement to preserve the building and protect the safety of pedestrians; � The removal of an eyesore from the centre of a conservation area; � The additional revenue to the borough council from two dwellings, London House and the extended annexe; � The regulation and reduction of traffic joining and leaving the A148 from the side of the existing shop enhancing road safety. � The building of a well designed, energy efficient dwelling, as an extension of the annexe, is the only way to make the project financially self-supporting. It is our wish to retain the traditional listed buildings and restore them into good repair. The design approach to the refurbishment of London House is to retain as much of the original features as possible, which gives them their intrinsic value and individuality. It is proposed to retain the external appearance of the building by repairing and redecorating areas affected by years of neglect. Internally the layout remains the same, with the exception of removing the stairs to the shop end of the building. These are not required and did not form part of the original dwelling. A new door opening has been inserted on ground floor to provide access to the old shop area, new family room. The removal of the shop frontage aids with Highways issues and goes with the change of use from shop to residential. This area will be infilled with brickwork. Ideally original re-used bricks will be sourced to infill this opening, however if this is not possible a new brick to match the existing will be sourced and agreed with the local authority. The design and detailing needs to be carefully handled so that the intrinsic quality and appearance of the traditional buildings is maintained. The design solution set out in this statement recognises the constraints and the design principles which need to be respected. In order to make the repair and conversion of London House commercially viable, it is important the annex can be separated away from Lime House and converted into an individual dwelling. The compulsory purchase of London House will therefore be beneficial to all parties. Therefore conversion of London House will help to secure the continued viability of the existing site and hence the preservation of the buildings themselves over the long term future”. 11/00950/F Development Control Board 25 July 2011 78
PLANNING HISTORY 11/00951/LB LISTED BUILDING CONSENT: Proposed development to create a self contained dwelling to the rear of Lime House & Restoration of London House – under consideration 07/00231/CU Change of use of stable to annexe to private dwelling – approved under delegated powers in April 2007 08/01958/LB Change of use of stable to annexe to private dwelling - Approved under delegated powers in October 2008 2/02/0218/F Extensions to house, Lime House – Approved under delegated powers March 2002 2/02/0217/LB Extensions to house Lime House – Approved under delegated powers March 2002 RESPONSE TO CONSULTATION Parish Council: SUPPORT No reasons given Highways Authority: NO OBJECTION subject to conditions to restrict the placing of gates and other barriers across the access over the old garage site; to restrict vehicular access to that shown across the old garage site and to ensure any other accesses are closed up; and to ensure that the parking is laid out as shown on the submitted plans. BCKLWN Environmental Health & Housing – Environmental Quality: NO OBJECTION subject to conditions to secure the investigation and remediation of any contaminated land relating to the historic garage use. BCKLWN Conservation Officer: NO OBJECTION recommends approval of the associated listed building application. BCKLWN Tree and Landscape Officer: NO OBJECTION subject to conditions. Conservation Areas Advisory Panel: NO OBJECTION The panel acknowledged that the proposals would bring London House back in to use. REPRESENTATIONS FIFTEEN letters of SUPPORT have been received applauding the applicant for their proposals and the positive impact they will have on London House. ONE letter COMMENTING that the correspondent generally supports the proposals but would like to see the old shop adjacent to London House removed rather than restored. NATIONAL GUIDANCE PPS1 - “Delivering Sustainable Development” (2005) sets out overarching policies on the delivery of sustainable development through the operation of the planning system and contains advice on design considerations. 11/00950/F Development Control Board 25 July 2011 79
Page 1 and 2:
DEVELOPMENT CONTROL BOARD AGENDA Mo
Page 3 and 4:
King’s Court, Chapel Street, King
Page 5 and 6:
11 PLANNING ENFORCEMENT - LAND AT 8
Page 7 and 8:
Item No. Application No. Location a
Page 9 and 10:
11/01064/CM Land at The Willows Bus
Page 11 and 12:
THE APPLICATION The site The site i
Page 13 and 14:
SUPPORTING CASE The following is ta
Page 15 and 16:
PLANNING HISTORY Willows Business P
Page 17 and 18:
� Combined emissions from other p
Page 19 and 20:
BCKLWN Environmental Health - Commu
Page 21 and 22:
Within 28 days from the receipt of
Page 23 and 24:
REPRESENTATIONS No separate consult
Page 25 and 26:
SAVED POLICIES OF THE NORFOLK WASTE
Page 27 and 28:
PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS The applica
Page 29 and 30:
For reasons referred to above and a
Page 31 and 32:
Involvement of the County Council i
Page 33 and 34:
The table below shows the scoring f
Page 35 and 36: Energy Utilisation There does appea
Page 37 and 38: The highest scoring site, if the sc
Page 39 and 40: It will be down to Norfolk County C
Page 41 and 42: However, the assessment concentrate
Page 43 and 44: 5) Reason The information presented
Page 45 and 46: 10/01419/FM Barwick Hall Farm Barwi
Page 47 and 48: Recommendation REFUSE THE APPLICATI
Page 49 and 50: hardstanding areas at the turbine l
Page 51 and 52: esidents had there windows open- th
Page 53 and 54: Norfolk Wildlife Trust: OBJECT Avoi
Page 55 and 56: Environmental Health & Housing - En
Page 57 and 58: NATIONAL GUIDANCE PPS1 - “Deliver
Page 59 and 60: POLICY CONTEXT PPS22 ‘Renewable E
Page 61 and 62: ased on 3-bladed turbines with a to
Page 63 and 64: � The typical height of wind turb
Page 65 and 66: Conservation (Natural Habitats &c)
Page 67 and 68: In this case, the proposal is not d
Page 69 and 70: With regard to Bloodgate Hill Fort,
Page 71 and 72: It has been recognised by the Plann
Page 73 and 74: the vast majority of the land conta
Page 75 and 76: Planning Authorities should ensure
Page 77 and 78: Parish: Denver AGENDA ITEM NO: 8/3(
Page 79 and 80: � Members should visit the site b
Page 81 and 82: Trees and Landscape The proposed ex
Page 83 and 84: 11/00950/F Lime House The Green Eas
Page 85: end of the property include an arch
Page 89 and 90: Impact upon Listed Buildings and Co
Page 91 and 92: designed in such a way as to minimi
Page 93 and 94: (iii) an appraisal of remedial opti
Page 95 and 96: 12 Condition There are some hard su
Page 97 and 98: 11/00951/LB Lime House The Green Ea
Page 99 and 100: an off-set carriage arch with board
Page 101 and 102: goes with the change of use from sh
Page 103 and 104: The PPS5 defines conservation as th
Page 105 and 106: Proposed Typical Carts Shed Plans _
Page 107 and 108: 11/00302/F Heacham Manor Hotel Huns
Page 109 and 110: such units in new buildings laid ou
Page 111 and 112: PPS4: Planning for Sustainable Econ
Page 113 and 114: � To avoid occupation by permanen
Page 115 and 116: 1 Reason To comply with Section 91
Page 117 and 118: 14 Condition All hard and soft land
Page 119 and 120: 24 Condition The bars and restauran
Page 121 and 122: Parish: Hockwold cum Wilton AGENDA
Page 123 and 124: The comparison between siting arran
Page 125 and 126: Given the extant 2003 approval, the
Page 127 and 128: RECOMMENDATION: APPROVE subject to
Page 129 and 130: Parish: King's Lynn AGENDA ITEM NO:
Page 131 and 132: Environment Agency: No objection -
Page 133 and 134: Particular concern had been raised
Page 135 and 136: Generally speaking residents of HMO
Page 137 and 138:
RECOMMENDATION: APPROVE subject to
Page 139 and 140:
Parish: Ringstead AGENDA ITEM NO: 8
Page 141 and 142:
e outside the current ‘built’ e
Page 143 and 144:
detached, two storey dwelling with
Page 145 and 146:
3 Condition Prior to the commenceme
Page 147 and 148:
11/00881/F The Old Smithy Church La
Page 149 and 150:
Previously planning permission was
Page 151 and 152:
REPRESENTATIONS No third party comm
Page 153 and 154:
The proposed extension can be achie
Page 155 and 156:
The proposed development is conside
Page 157 and 158:
10 Reason To ensure that risks from
Page 159 and 160:
11/00812/O The Beeches 122 Grimston
Page 161 and 162:
SUPPORTING CASE The application is
Page 163 and 164:
PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS Principle o
Page 165 and 166:
4 Reason To ensure satisfactory lan
Page 167 and 168:
Parish: Upwell AGENDA ITEM NO: 8/3(
Page 169 and 170:
Environment Agency: No Comment Inte
Page 171 and 172:
The applicants’ agent addresses t
Page 173 and 174:
The Sale Full details of the sale p
Page 175 and 176:
AGENDA ITEM: 9 167 DEVELOPMENT CONT
Page 177 and 178:
169 Brancaster 11/00514/F Mr S Glyn
Page 179 and 180:
171 Dersingham 11/00744/O Mrs Angel
Page 181 and 182:
173 Hilgay 11/00612/F Mr & Mrs Gilb
Page 183 and 184:
175 King's Lynn 11/00747/CU College
Page 185 and 186:
177 Middleton 27.05.2011 24.06.2011
Page 187 and 188:
179 Snettisham 11/00539/F Mr & Mrs
Page 189 and 190:
181 Thornham 11/00455/NMA_1 Mr A Mo
Page 191 and 192:
183 West Rudham 11/00741/F Client o
Page 193 and 194:
De minimis 2 Delegated Authority -
Page 195 and 196:
187 Installation of upvc windows in
Page 197 and 198:
189 Unauthorised change of use of l
Page 199 and 200:
191 Pending Consideration Alleged u
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
195 DC Application Submitted allege
Page 205 and 206:
197 Pending Consideration Unauthori
Page 207 and 208:
199 Pending Consideration Alleged r
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
203 Pending Consideration School Ho
Page 213 and 214:
205 Pending Consideration One Acre
Page 215 and 216:
207 Pending Consideration alleged b
Page 217 and 218:
209 Alleged breach of planning perm
Page 219 and 220:
211 Pending Consideration KC 2000 L
Page 221 and 222:
213 Pending Consideration alleged u
Page 223 and 224:
215 Pending Consideration alleged b
Page 225 and 226:
217 5 Magdalen Road Tilney St Lawre
Page 227 and 228:
219 alleged breach of conditions re
Page 229 and 230:
221 DC Application Submitted allege
Page 231 and 232:
Page 233 and 234:
225 Pending Consideration Condition
Page 235 and 236:
227 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL BOARD AGEND
Page 237 and 238:
4.0 PLANNING HISTORY 10/00200/F - S
Page 239 and 240:
231 for Gypsy & Travellers. The par
Page 241 and 242:
maximum fine on summary conviction
Page 243 and 244:
12.5 It is also of note that direct
Page 245 and 246:
237
Page 247 and 248:
239
show all

11/00713/F - Borough Council of King's Lynn & West Norfolk

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?