07.01.2013 Views

11/00713/F - Borough Council of King's Lynn & West Norfolk

11/00713/F - Borough Council of King's Lynn & West Norfolk

11/00713/F - Borough Council of King's Lynn & West Norfolk

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

� Combined emissions from other point sources - The proposed site is adjacent to<br />

two existing significant point sources <strong>of</strong> emissions, namely the gas fired power<br />

station and Palm Paper Mill as well as two other proposed developments, the power<br />

station extension and Palm sludge combustor which have planning permission but<br />

are yet to be built. The application must also include an assessment <strong>of</strong> the combined<br />

impact <strong>of</strong> emissions from all the point sources and their likely impact on the locality.<br />

This application should not be considered in isolation.<br />

� Impact on human health - Municipal waste incinerators (MWI) can produce a<br />

number <strong>of</strong> different pollutants such as Dioxins, Furans, heavy metals, Carbon<br />

Dioxide, Carbon Monoxide, Nitrogen Dioxide, acid gases (e.g. HCL, SO2) and<br />

particulates (e.g. PM10 & PM2.5). These can impact on both the short term and long<br />

term health <strong>of</strong> humans. Additional traffic movements can impact human health (NO2,<br />

PM10 & PM2.5)<br />

To assist in this planning application, Air Quality Consultants Ltd (AQC) have been engaged<br />

to critically peer review the air quality assessment which forms part <strong>of</strong> the Environmental<br />

Statement submitted by Cory Wheeleabrator as part <strong>of</strong> the planning application. AQC will<br />

provide expert, unbiased opinion on the application and its potential impact.<br />

Due to the large amount <strong>of</strong> detailed information submitted and the relatively short<br />

consultation period time to consider the information, only an initial view <strong>of</strong> the application can<br />

be presented today. Appendix 7.1 <strong>of</strong> the Environmental Statement was not released until 29<br />

June 20<strong>11</strong>, one week after the consultation period began on the 22nd June 20<strong>11</strong>.<br />

AQC Ltd’s initial conclusions are as follows: -<br />

Mitigation<br />

Mitigation measures are identified within the Environmental Statement include:<br />

� �A Construction Environmental Management Plan.<br />

� �An Odour Management Plan.<br />

The suggested measures are appropriate and it is recommended that suitably worded<br />

conditions are attached to the planning permission, to ensure that these measures are put in<br />

place.<br />

No mitigation is discussed with respect to the Incinerator Bottom Ash (IBA) handling. It will<br />

be essential that a Dust Management Plan is put in place to minimise <strong>of</strong>f-site dust and heavy<br />

metal impacts. The requirement for a Dust Management Plan should also be secured by<br />

suitably worded condition.<br />

Although the impact <strong>of</strong> the Proposals upon nitrogen dioxide concentrations within the Air<br />

Quality Management Area will be small, it will be contrary to the aims <strong>of</strong> the Air Quality<br />

Action Plan, to reduce concentrations to below UK Air Quality Objectives (which are also EU<br />

Limit Values). Therefore it would be appropriate to obtain a contribution from the developer<br />

towards implementation <strong>of</strong> measures within the Action Plan. In addition, consideration<br />

should be given to any practicable measures available to reduce the impact <strong>of</strong> emissions<br />

from vehicles travelling to and from the site.<br />

<strong>11</strong>/01064/CM Development Control Board<br />

25 July 20<strong>11</strong><br />

9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!